2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photocatalytic properties of mesoporous TiO2 nanocomposites modified with carbon nanotubes and copper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of the (1 0 0) reflection in the low angle XRD pattern of the mesoporous TiO 2 (Fig. S1) is identical to that previously observed in mesoporous TiO 2 [17] and confirms the mesoporous structure of this phase.…”
Section: Zno and Nanoparticle And Mesoporous Tiosupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of the (1 0 0) reflection in the low angle XRD pattern of the mesoporous TiO 2 (Fig. S1) is identical to that previously observed in mesoporous TiO 2 [17] and confirms the mesoporous structure of this phase.…”
Section: Zno and Nanoparticle And Mesoporous Tiosupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The TEM micrograph of the mesoporous TiO 2 (Fig. 4c) is as expected in this material [17] and shows this phase to possess a nano structure with a pore size in the range 5-10 nm [25].…”
Section: Zno and Nanoparticle And Mesoporous Tiomentioning
confidence: 91%
“…4d to study the copper states in the film. The main Cu2p3/2 peak at 932.7eV represented the Cu 0 in Cu metal, while the minor Cu 2p3/2 peak at 934.6eV (along with two satellite peaks at 941.8 eV and 944.1 eV) were assigned to the Cu 2+ state in CuO, as reported by Meng et al (2016), Nourbakhsh et al (2016), and Liu et al (2017). Compared with the Cu 2+ content (38%), a higher Cu 0 content (62%) was obtained through calculation of the peak area, which indicated that most of the surface copper atoms are metallic.…”
Section: Characterizations Via Sem Eds Xrd Ftir and Xpsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The results showed that the addition of PANi into TiO 2 -bsed photocatalysts made less of a difference to photo-catalytic activity under UV and visible light irradiation [ 29 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]. Nevertheless, a better photo-catalytic performance of TiO 2 -based photocatalysts without PANi addition was found when irradiated with UV light [ 59 , 60 ]. The reaction rate constants of PANi-CNT/TiO 2 photocatalysts (1.8 × 10 −3 –5.7 × 10 -3 1/min) were similar or even higher than most of those TiO 2 -based photocatalysts listed in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%