2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.06.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photochemical treatment of phenol aqueous solutions using ultraviolet radiation and hydrogen peroxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the FTIR spectrum of the oxide after adsorption (Fig. 7B), we cannot observe any characteristic vibration bands of PhOH, but a peak at 1365 cm −1 which is exclusively attributed to the CO 3 [17]. During the adsorption of PhOH, CO 2 contamination cannot be avoided, in particular under the basic condition (pH 10-11).…”
Section: Adsorption Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the FTIR spectrum of the oxide after adsorption (Fig. 7B), we cannot observe any characteristic vibration bands of PhOH, but a peak at 1365 cm −1 which is exclusively attributed to the CO 3 [17]. During the adsorption of PhOH, CO 2 contamination cannot be avoided, in particular under the basic condition (pH 10-11).…”
Section: Adsorption Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can persist for many years in the environment because of their resistance to microbiological degradation. In the last decade, various methods have been proposed to remove phenols, including catalytic oxidation [1,2], photo-oxidation [3], electrochemical oxidation [4], biological degradation [5], ultrafiltration [6] and adsorption [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Since the other methods need special process requirements or special catalysts, adsorption seems to be a good choice in terms of the cost and operation for the removal of phenolic compounds from wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the BP3 degradation at pH 10 was almost 20% slower when H 2 O 2 was added. Since in this case high concentrations of hydroxyl radicals and H 2 O 2 are present simultaneously, the observed rate retardation most probably results from the consumption/scavenging of hydroxyl radicals by H 2 O 2 , yielding less reactive radicals (such as HO 2 • ) in the solution [80].…”
Section: Bp3 Oxidation By the Peroxone Processmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The flasks were agitated for 100 min on a magnetic stirrer at ambient temperature (25 ± 2 • C). The influence of initial 2,4-DNP concentration (100, 200, 300, 400, 500 mg/L), contact time (20, 40, 60, 80, 100 min), particle size (0.192, 0.25, 0.390, 0.780, 1.700 mm), pH (4,5,6,7,8), biosorbent dose (2,4,6,8,10 g/100 mL), and temperature (25,30,35,40,45 • C) was evaluated. Samples were collected from the flasks at predetermined time intervals for analyzing the residual 2,4-DNP concentration in the solution.…”
Section: Batch Biosorption Equilibrium and Kinetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%