1956
DOI: 10.1063/1.1722357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoconductive and Photoelectromagnetic Effects in InSb

Abstract: Photoconductive (PC) and photoelectromagnetic (PEM) effects have been observed in p-type InSb single crystals of high purity at nOK (extrinsic range) and 301°K (intrinsic range). Because of the large electron mobilities in InSb, and because the variation of the PEM response with magnetic field was found to be strongly dependent on surface treatment, it was necessary to develop a new theoretical model to describe the PEM effect, permitting the evaluation of bulk lifetime and both electron and hole mobilities. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1957
1957
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computed difference between radiation intensities in an lnSb sample near the illuminated and unilluminnted surfaces versus sample thickness obtained by using (4), assuming 3, = 6.6 pm, n = 4.01, x = 0.059, n1 = 1.0, n2 = 1. 5 for different values of sample thickness. The obtained results are shown on Fig.…”
Section: The Distribution Of Radiation Intensity In a Thin Semiconducmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed difference between radiation intensities in an lnSb sample near the illuminated and unilluminnted surfaces versus sample thickness obtained by using (4), assuming 3, = 6.6 pm, n = 4.01, x = 0.059, n1 = 1.0, n2 = 1. 5 for different values of sample thickness. The obtained results are shown on Fig.…”
Section: The Distribution Of Radiation Intensity In a Thin Semiconducmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dashed ciirvo shows the correction t,o the top solid curve resulting from 50n,, light reflection from the back surfewe. (1) s = lo4, t = lo5;(2) lo4, lo6; (3) 3.2 1. : :.' 104, 105; (4) 105, 3.2 ;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ni (9) For simple idealized generation functions G,,(t), ln*I < 1, B = 0 there exist analytical solutions of the system (8) or (9) and (3) [18,191. We, however, must solve the equations numerically, since with B + 0 due to the magnetoconcentration n* is, in general, not small, the PEM effect must be taken into account and the generation function of the photo-injected carriers cannot be approximated by a Dirac's delta distribution in our case.…”
Section: Gdt)mentioning
confidence: 99%