1992
DOI: 10.1063/1.107286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoconductive gain mechanism of quantum-well intersubband infrared detectors

Abstract: Taking into account the discrete nature of the quantum-well intersubband infrared detectors, we construct a model to calculate the photoconductive gain. It is shown that the photoconductive gain is inversely proportional to the number of quantum wells and that the detector-current responsivity is independent of the number of wells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has resulted in the proposal of several theoretical models [5][6][7][8] to express primary QWIP characteristics such as responsivity, detectivity, photoconductive gain and photocurrent. However, the QWIP formulas derived from these different models vary due to the diversity in definitions and basic assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has resulted in the proposal of several theoretical models [5][6][7][8] to express primary QWIP characteristics such as responsivity, detectivity, photoconductive gain and photocurrent. However, the QWIP formulas derived from these different models vary due to the diversity in definitions and basic assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the induced charge-density fluctuations in the QWs will be compensated by the concomitant change of the time-dependent tunneling current compared to its initial steady-state value and the system will eventually reach a final steady state with a different static tunneling current after a characteristic time (in the range of 1 s) similar to the charging/discharging time of a capacitive system in classical electrodynamics. 1 A. Time-dependent device temperature 7" e (f) [4][5][6] The capture process of carriers flowing above the barriers 10 has not been neglected in Eq. (4) although it has not been explicitly shown.…”
Section: Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffusion of electrons from 3D to 2D states (and vice versa) is a particularly difficult theoretical problem 5,6 . That is why most models use adjustable parameters such as the capture time 7 or the capture probability, affecting the photoconductive gain 8 . In quantum cascade lasers, on another side, significant electric fields are applied, resulting in charge transfers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%