The spectral sensitivity and the irradiance dependence of anthocyanin synthesis, a "high irradiance response," in cabbage (Brassica oleracea, cv. Red Acre) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, cv. Beefsteak) seedlings exposed to continuous irradiation depend upon the length of the exposure. In cabbage, blue and red are more effective than far red when the irradiations are shorter than 12 hours and less effective than far red when the irradiations are longer than 12 hours. The irradiance dependence is negigble under red and becomes evident under blue and far red red only for exposures longer than 12 hours. Anthocyanin synthesis under intermittent Ught treatments, of effidency comparable to that of continuous treatments, obeys the Bunsen-Roscoe reciprocity law and is a function of the dose (irradiance x time), rather than of the irradiance alone. The validity of the reciprocity relationships suggests that only one photoreceptor is responsible for the photocontrol of the response in the blue, red, and far red spectral regions. The characteristics of the response suggest that the photoreceptor is phytochrome, at least in cabbage.The nature of the pigments active in the photocontrol of the HIR2 responses of plant photomorphogenesis (1, 13, 16) is still a topic for debate. Phytochrome is active in HIR processes, but it is not definitively known if it is the only photoreceptor involved. Several factors are responsible for the difficulties encountered in identifying the HIR photoreceptors(s): (a) the variability of the spectral sensitivity of the HIR: some responses show maximum action in the FR region (1,2,7,8), some others in the BL (2,3,5,6), and some in the R (2); (b) the irradiance dependence of the HIR: it can be theoretically explained on the basis of phytochrome (1,7,14,17), but the assumptions made are not completely consistent with the variability of the spectral sensitivity of the HIR in different response-systemn combinations; (c) the reciprocity failure of the HIR under continuous irradiation: equal TRDs, obtained by reciprocal changes of irradiance and time (I x t = nI x tin), do not produce the same extent of the response (3, 13). The reciprocity failure suggests the possibility of a cooperation between different photoreceptors and creates difficulties in the interpretation of action spectroscopy studies (15).In a previous note (10), we suggested that the reciprocity failure of the HIR could be explained in terms of phytochrome, and that the irradiance dependence perhaps was no more than (8,10), the fact that phytochrome was involved in the photocontrol of anthocyanin production under inductive conditions (8, 9), and some ancillary observations (9, 11, 12) strongly suggested that the photoreceptor was phytochrome.Considerable amounts of anthocyanin are formed in cabbage seedlings exposed to continuous BL and R radiation (8,11,12). The objectives of the present study were to determine if reciprocity would be retained under intermittent BL and R irradiations, and if a comparative study of the actio...