1980
DOI: 10.1149/1.2130008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photocurrent Spectroscopy of Interface States at a Semiconductor‐Electrolyte Junction

Abstract: We have investigated the photocurrent induced by subbandgap light irradiation at the n-Si-aqueous electrolyte junction., The observed effect is shown to arise from optical processes involving interface states, and mainly from electron transitions from the filled interface states to the conduction band. The dependence of the photocurrent upon anodic voltage is accounted for quantitatively by considering the Schottky barrier lowering effect, already measured from the dark I-V characteristics. The dependence of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is verified by the rectifying /(F) characteristics obtained for nearly all of the (26) The present data might alternately be interpreted by invoking a filling (change of population) of preexisting surface states upon contact with the redox electrolyte. We think this alternate interpretation can be dismissed for the following reasons: (i) For a given redox system (e.g., NB/NB" or AQ/ AQ") the characteristic time for pinning seems to be rather insensitive to the concentrations of the redox species, (ii) Bandgap irradiation of oxidized surfaces causes hole trapping in the surface states, thereby decreasing the magnitude of the subbandgap photoeffect (see ref 17 and 25); turning the bandgap light on and off hence provides a technique for measuring directly the equilibration time of the surface states population. This time is found to be smaller than the lock-in response time (0.3 s) except for strongly oxidized surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is verified by the rectifying /(F) characteristics obtained for nearly all of the (26) The present data might alternately be interpreted by invoking a filling (change of population) of preexisting surface states upon contact with the redox electrolyte. We think this alternate interpretation can be dismissed for the following reasons: (i) For a given redox system (e.g., NB/NB" or AQ/ AQ") the characteristic time for pinning seems to be rather insensitive to the concentrations of the redox species, (ii) Bandgap irradiation of oxidized surfaces causes hole trapping in the surface states, thereby decreasing the magnitude of the subbandgap photoeffect (see ref 17 and 25); turning the bandgap light on and off hence provides a technique for measuring directly the equilibration time of the surface states population. This time is found to be smaller than the lock-in response time (0.3 s) except for strongly oxidized surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sub- E g response is even more pronounced in the 30 nm film (at least 3 nanocrystal layers, containing some crystals which are no longer size-quantized (larger than 12 nm) and should have a band gap of 1.74 eV); it extends considerably beyond the bulk band gap value. Sub- E g response has been observed previously in semiconductor photoelectrodes, and attributed to absorption in intra-band-gap states. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The predominant mode for photocurrent generation in a semiconductor photoelectrode under illumination is through absorption of suprabandgap light, i.e., promotion of excited electrons and holes into the conduction and valence bands, respectively (Figure ). However, sub-bandgap light can also induce measurable photocurrent if there is an appreciable density of midgap states in which charge carriers can be promoted to/from. , For the commercial grade crystalline GaP used in this study, the prevalence of midgap states in the bulk and surface of GaP has been identified previously and shown to induce detectable levels of photocurrent . Since both the absorption cross-section and the total density of such defects are small, the expected sub-bandgap photocurrents can be vanishingly small.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, sub-bandgap light can also induce measurable photocurrent if there is an appreciable density of midgap states in which charge carriers can be promoted to/ from. 44,45 For the commercial grade crystalline GaP used in this study, the prevalence of midgap states in the bulk and surface of GaP has been identified previously 40 and shown to induce detectable levels of photocurrent. 46 Since both the absorption cross-section and the total density of such defects are small, the expected sub-bandgap photocurrents can be vanishingly small.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%