1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02128649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photodegradation of the surfactants na-dodecylbenzenesulfonate and dodecylpyridinium-chloride as affected by humic substances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, the UV pretreatment did not destroy all of the soil organic matter that was not BC. Humic substances are relatively resistant to UV irradiation [56][57][58][59]. Consequently, part of the humic substances survive the irradiation and are determined as BC.…”
Section: Black Carbon In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, the UV pretreatment did not destroy all of the soil organic matter that was not BC. Humic substances are relatively resistant to UV irradiation [56][57][58][59]. Consequently, part of the humic substances survive the irradiation and are determined as BC.…”
Section: Black Carbon In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aid of catalysts such as Fe(III)-Fe(II), Mn(IV)-Mn(III)-Mn(II), or soil oxidoreductases such as polyphenoloxidases, brown to dark brown polymers are synthesized, also incorporating amino acids, amino sugars, sugars [6], probably black carbon, and a variety of organic xenobiotics, e.g., triazines (Senesi et al [65]; Müller-Wegener [66,67]), or surfactants [58,68].…”
Section: Humic Substances In Soils: a Reformulated Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this study, without adequate interaction between LAS and bacteria in the biofilms, the biodegradation of LAS was minor in a 36-h period. As to photolysis, studies were usually carried out under UV illumination in the presence of oxidants, such as H 2 O 2 and O 3 [14,17,19,36,37], and/or photocatalysts such as TiO 2 and ZnO [37,41,42], and/or photosensitizer such as dyes and humic substances [42,43], and the degradation was usually fairly quick. However, the photolysis of LAS in pure water under illumination of visible light could hardly be observed [19,42], and the photolysis in sterilized natural water was also found to be relatively slow (t 1/2 = 6-14 d) [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UV/NMR method after Skjemstad et al [19] also overestimates BC which may explain the extremely high BC values for this method in the comparative study to Schmidt et al [17]. This may be due to only partial destruction of non-BC carbon in soil, mainly humic substances which were shown to be resistant to UV irradiation (e.g., [30] and references therein). Novotny et al [10] formulated the same argument on the rejection of the UV/NMR method for the determination of soil BC as follows: "Removal … of non-pyrogenic C depends on the oxidation intensity which is overall lowest in the case of photooxidation….…”
Section: Simpson and Hatchermentioning
confidence: 92%