2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photodeposition of amorphous MoS x cocatalyst on TiO 2 nanosheets with {001} facets exposed for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as comparison is possible, our absolute PHER values are lower than the literature values for copper and nickel sulfides [14,39]. Our values for molybdenum sulfide are lower than for amorphous MoS x reported in [10] but higher than observed earlier for the MoS 2 nanosheets [40]. However if approximately re-calculated for the same conditions (lamp power and slurry concentration, Table S2, Fig.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Her Activitycontrasting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As far as comparison is possible, our absolute PHER values are lower than the literature values for copper and nickel sulfides [14,39]. Our values for molybdenum sulfide are lower than for amorphous MoS x reported in [10] but higher than observed earlier for the MoS 2 nanosheets [40]. However if approximately re-calculated for the same conditions (lamp power and slurry concentration, Table S2, Fig.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Her Activitycontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Beside the efforts of fundamental understanding, great number of research works report on the empirical studies of novel catalysts combining titania and nanoparticles of various co-catalysts, aiming to enhance PHER performance. Much attention has been recently paid to the studies of layered sulfides on titania, particularly to the MoS 2 /TiO 2 composites [10], which has been recently reviewed [11]. MoS 2 is considered as a cheap alternative to platinum, both for electrochemical HER and PHER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest yield and the highest enhancement factor are however measured with amorphous MoS X co-catalyst [21,40]. that the rate-determining step is gradually favored with the increase of the co-catalyst loading.…”
Section: Influence Of the Rus 2 Loadingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…By contrast, RuS 2 is not the most studied transition metal sulfide co-catalyst. More attention has been recently paid to MoS 2 [20,21,[38][39][40], to NiS x [23,41,42] or to cheaper materials such as CuS [24,43]. However, we recently evidenced that among a series of seven transition metal sulfides deposited on TiO 2 , RuS 2 was one of the most efficient PHER co-catalyst [17].…”
Section: Table Of Content Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The report published by Yu et al. shows that the photocatalytic performance of TiO 2 , g‐C 3 N 4 and CdS is greatly improved with the incorporation of MoS x . The report published by Hai et al., showed that MoS 2 monolayers with poorly crystallinity synthesized through the liquid exfoliation, have higher properties than that of Pt .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%