1954
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.95.574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photodisintegration of Deuterium by 265-Mev Bremsstrahlung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1956
1956
1965
1965

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of the deuteron should be possible without explicit reference to the meson fields through which the nucleons interact 23 and, indeed, good agreement with experiment is obtained up to about 10 Mev. 1 From 20 to 60 Mev the total cross sections are still in reasonable agreement with experiment, 8 but departures are noted in the angular distributions. The experiments indicate a growing isotropic component while calculations 21 of the dominant electric dipole and quadrupole transitions from the 3 S state assuming a central potential give zero cross sections at 0° and 180°.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Comparison With Theorysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…of the deuteron should be possible without explicit reference to the meson fields through which the nucleons interact 23 and, indeed, good agreement with experiment is obtained up to about 10 Mev. 1 From 20 to 60 Mev the total cross sections are still in reasonable agreement with experiment, 8 but departures are noted in the angular distributions. The experiments indicate a growing isotropic component while calculations 21 of the dominant electric dipole and quadrupole transitions from the 3 S state assuming a central potential give zero cross sections at 0° and 180°.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Comparison With Theorysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In other deuteron photodisintegration experiments where range or energy counters have been used, the correction for this effect has been calculated on the basis of assumptions about the cross sections and angular distributions involved. Yamagata et al 18 found that in the energy range of this experiment a maximum correction of 17.6% was obtained if the geometrical cross section was taken as the nuclear scattering cross section. On the assumption of total neutron cross sections, a maximum correction of 28.3% was calculated.…”
Section: Correction To the Proton Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%