1989
DOI: 10.1002/sia.740140613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoelectron diffraction and surface crystallography

Abstract: We report here the state of development of photoemission diffraction from core levels as a tool for the investigation of surfaces. Experimental procedures for performing reproducible and accurate photoemission diffraction curves are formulated. To this end, the merit and the limitations in the choice of different parameters, such as photoelectron kinetic energy or detection angles, are discussed in view of various applications. The discussion is largely exemplied from our experiences, as well as from those in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 In contrast to kinetic energies lower than ∼200 eV, back-and multiple-scattering of the emerging photoelectrons are less pronounced and the resulting spectra are less complex. 13 According to the single scattering model, 11 enhanced intensity arises from the forward-scattering of photoelectrons by neighboring atoms along the forward direction. The XPD probe depth for our experiments was 36 Å as estimated using the inelastic mean free path (IMFP) of Zn 2p 3/2 photoelectrons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12,13 In contrast to kinetic energies lower than ∼200 eV, back-and multiple-scattering of the emerging photoelectrons are less pronounced and the resulting spectra are less complex. 13 According to the single scattering model, 11 enhanced intensity arises from the forward-scattering of photoelectrons by neighboring atoms along the forward direction. The XPD probe depth for our experiments was 36 Å as estimated using the inelastic mean free path (IMFP) of Zn 2p 3/2 photoelectrons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XPD probe depth for our experiments was 36 Å as estimated using the inelastic mean free path (IMFP) of Zn 2p 3/2 photoelectrons. 13 The latter was calculated using the universal IMFP equation that effectively describes mean free paths for high-energy electrons. 14 In ZnS, every zinc atom is surrounded by four sulfur atoms in a tetrahedral arrangement which results in either cubic (sphalerite) or, slightly distorted, hexagonal (wurtzite) structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a diffraction technique, XPD reveals all the crystallographic directions of the nearest neighbors of this photoelectron emitter. [18][19][20] But because XPD is a very short-range probe of the local atomic arrangement around the photoelectron emitter, it has to be compared to a long-range probe such as TEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 At lower energies multiple scattering has to be taken into account, and if there is a structural order of the film molecules the diffraction of photoelectrons can result in additional intensity maxima that are not (only) related to forward scattering. In principle, such x-ray photoelectron diffraction (XPD) studies can also be performed by tilting the film sample with respect to the analyser of a laboratory-based XPS system as described above.…”
Section: Film Structure and Molecular Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%