1995
DOI: 10.1039/cs9952400289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoenzymic repair of UV-damaged DNA: a chemist's perspective

Abstract: work on the photochemistry offlavins. He is currently a Senior Lecturer in Chemistry in the Faculty of Science and Technology at the North East Wales Institute, Wrexham. His research interests are the photobiology of D N A repair, photochemistry of photomovement of microorganisms, and industrial applications of photochemistry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
157
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
12
157
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although neither of the two thio analogs of the proposed oxetane or azetidine intermediates were substrates for the enzyme, they do not rule out these intermediates in the catalytic mechanism. The lack of binding of the s 5 T[thietane]m 3 T analog is consistent with the proposed role of 3Ј-N-3 of the pyrimidone ring in substrate binding and catalysis. The lack of binding of both thietane analogs might also be due to substantial structural differences that result from differences in the lengths of C-S and either C-O or N-O bonds (1.8 versus 1.5 Å, respectively).…”
Section: Fig 10supporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although neither of the two thio analogs of the proposed oxetane or azetidine intermediates were substrates for the enzyme, they do not rule out these intermediates in the catalytic mechanism. The lack of binding of the s 5 T[thietane]m 3 T analog is consistent with the proposed role of 3Ј-N-3 of the pyrimidone ring in substrate binding and catalysis. The lack of binding of both thietane analogs might also be due to substantial structural differences that result from differences in the lengths of C-S and either C-O or N-O bonds (1.8 versus 1.5 Å, respectively).…”
Section: Fig 10supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Toward this end we tested the following substrates (Fig. 3A): the Dewar isomer (2) which cannot form the oxetane intermediate; the thietane analog of oxetane intermediate (5) which is in equilibrium with the s 5 -(6-4) product and predicted to be repaired efficiently; the N-methyl-3Ј-T thietane analog of the oxetane intermediate (6) which is locked in the thietane form and was predicted to be split very efficiently; and the s 5 -methyl analog of (6-4) product (4) which presumably cannot be reversed to thietane and was predicted to be refractory to photorepair.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in this fascinating subject (9-31) was triggered recently by the studies of Barton and her colleagues (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), which seemed to indicate the occurrence of long-range, almost distance-independent charge separation in DNA, manifesting ''chemistry at a distance'' (17). The problem of charge separation in DNA is pertinent for the realization of a particular DNA repair mechanism as an alternative to the DNA-photolyase (20)(21)(22)(23), which rests on long-range charge transfer to the defect site, i.e., a thymine dimer followed by concurrent or sequential bond breaking. Moreover, a deeper understanding of charge migration processes and of the effects of electronic excess charges localized at specific nucleic bases has wide range implications for (i) protein binding to DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, in the present study, we examined the splitting of the (64) photoproduct in the case of the radical cation ( Figure 2B) to search other efficient pathways, although the electron transfer from the TT lesion to the cofactor FAD has been little considered except some computational examinations for the CPD 8, 12 and the (64) photoproduct. 13 If the cofactor FAD exists as the fully reduced form FADH ¹ , the excited FADH ¹ * formed by an energy transmission from the second cofactor might receive an electron from the TT lesion, 3,12,14 which results in the formation of FADH…”
Section: ¹1mentioning
confidence: 99%