2013
DOI: 10.12816/0014950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photogrammetric Analysis of Facial Soft Tissue Profile of Iraqi Adults Sample with Class I Normal Occlusion : A Cross Sectional Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been documented in many studies that the reference line passing through the nose (S1, E) showed more protrusion in females as males have increased nasal prominence, which contributes to reduced prominence of the lips. 18 The reason S2 line showed more protrusion in the males could be because of increased thickness of the upper lip in males as compared to females, and this comes in agreement with the reports of Arnett et al, 19 Kalba et al, 20 and Lalitha et al 21…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been documented in many studies that the reference line passing through the nose (S1, E) showed more protrusion in females as males have increased nasal prominence, which contributes to reduced prominence of the lips. 18 The reason S2 line showed more protrusion in the males could be because of increased thickness of the upper lip in males as compared to females, and this comes in agreement with the reports of Arnett et al, 19 Kalba et al, 20 and Lalitha et al 21…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It has been documented in many studies that the reference line passing through the nose (S1, E) showed more protrusion in females as males have increased nasal prominence, which contributes to reduced prominence of the lips. 18 The reason S2 line showed more protrusion in the males could be because of increased thickness of the upper lip in males as compared to females, and this comes in agreement with the reports of Arnett et al, 19 Kalba et al, 20 and Lalitha et al 21 The significant difference for Sushner's S2 line for lower lip when compared to Caucasians could be due to posteriorly positioned forehead and nasion in Indians as compared to Caucasians. 22 Also the mandibular anteriors were more upright in the North Indian population as observed in a study done by Patil et al 23 The findings of Umale et al 24 revealed that in a North Indian sample of pleasing profile of both upper and lower lips were more retrusive than the normative values of Steiner's, Ricketts', Burston's and Sushner's.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…U mnogim studijama je dokumentovano da su referentne linije koje prolaze kroz nos (Stajnerova, Riketsova) pokazale veće vrednosti kod ženske populacije jer muškarci imaju veće nazalno ispupčenje, što doprinosi smanjenom ispupčenju usana (29). Pošto je našim istraživanjem utvrđeno da je prosečno rastojanje usana od Riketsove linije za muškarce 7,48/5,42 mm, dok je za žene 5,82/3,87 mm, a prosečno rastojanje usana od Stajnerove linije 2,80/2,49 mm za muškarce, a 1,99/2,21 mm za žene, možemo zaključiti da se ova tvrdnja u potpunosti podudara sa dobijenim…”
Section: Diskusijaunclassified
“…vrednostima u studiji sprovedenoj u Iraku (29). Za kraj ove diskusije važno je istaći da je fokus ovog istraživanja bio na usnama, ali da svakako sam oblik usana, kao i njihova veličina nisu jedina stavka koja utiče na to da li će nečiji profil odgovarati propisanim referentnim vrednostima.…”
Section: R S2unclassified