2001
DOI: 10.1086/319184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoionization and High‐Density Gas

Abstract: We present results of calculations using the XSTAR version 2 computer code.This code is loosely based on the XSTAR v.1 code which has been available for public use for some time. However it represents an improvement and update in several major respects, including atomic data, code structure, user interface, and improved physical description of ionization/excitation. In particular, it now is applicable to high density situations in which significant excited atomic level populations are likely to occur. We descr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
592
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 617 publications
(605 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
592
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability above $2 keV can be explained by flux changes of a single component, a scattered power law with intrinsic absorption of N H ¼ 10 22:5 cm À2 . Strong Fe K line emission would not be expected from scattering off of a highly ionized plasma ( $ 10 5 ergs cm s À1 ) where the Fe atoms are largely stripped of electrons (Kallman & Bautista 2001).…”
Section: X-ray Variability and Spectral Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability above $2 keV can be explained by flux changes of a single component, a scattered power law with intrinsic absorption of N H ¼ 10 22:5 cm À2 . Strong Fe K line emission would not be expected from scattering off of a highly ionized plasma ( $ 10 5 ergs cm s À1 ) where the Fe atoms are largely stripped of electrons (Kallman & Bautista 2001).…”
Section: X-ray Variability and Spectral Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our theoretical results, obtained for ions in both the ground and metastable states, have been compared with high-resolution experimental measurements and with other theoretical methods. They should be suitable for incorporation into astrophysical modeling codes such as CLOUDY [57,58], XSTAR [20], and AtomDB [59] used to numerically simulate the thermal and ionization structures of ionized astrophysical nebulae.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we created a grid of self-consistent photoionization models with XSTAR ( Kallman & Bautista 2001). These were read into XSPEC as a multiplicative model to fit the HEG spectral data.…”
Section: Photo-ionization Modeling Of the Chandra Datamentioning
confidence: 99%