2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4771928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoluminescence studies in CuInS2 thin films grown by sulfurization using ditertiarybutylsulfide

Abstract: The defect-related levels of CuInS2 thin films prepared by sulfurization using ditertiarybutylsulfide [(t-C4H9)2S:DTBS] have been investigated by photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The PL spectra exhibit four peaks at 1.43, 1.27, 1.21, and 1.17 eV. On the basis of the PL spectra observed at various excitation intensities and temperatures, the peak emissions are attributed to donor–acceptor pair transitions. The ionization energies of donors in CuInS2 thin films are determined to be 66, 330, 300, and 150 meV,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Steady-state spectroscopy performed on CIS QDs indicates the involvement of intragap states in the PL process, consistent with studies on CIS in thin film and bulk. [29][30][31][32]47 In this study, TA spectroscopy was performed on CIS/ZnS QDs, revealing two time constants (27 and 1.8 ps) in the recovery of the negative component. We identify the 27 ps time constant as Auger recombination and the 1.8 ps time constant as population flow into a surface defect state.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Steady-state spectroscopy performed on CIS QDs indicates the involvement of intragap states in the PL process, consistent with studies on CIS in thin film and bulk. [29][30][31][32]47 In this study, TA spectroscopy was performed on CIS/ZnS QDs, revealing two time constants (27 and 1.8 ps) in the recovery of the negative component. We identify the 27 ps time constant as Auger recombination and the 1.8 ps time constant as population flow into a surface defect state.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[18][19][20] On the other hand, the defect level of the sulfur atom-occupied copper vacancies (S Cu ) is a donor level, which is located at 280-300 meV below the conduction band. 8,19) The shallower level of the P1 peak at 160 ± 10 meV is determined to be due to the S i defect level, and the deeper level at 290 ± 10 meV is attributed to the S Cu defect level. In addition, the 1.21 eV emission peak has already been reported in our previous studies, 8,15) in which the transition from the S i level to the S Cu level is described.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…8,19) The shallower level of the P1 peak at 160 ± 10 meV is determined to be due to the S i defect level, and the deeper level at 290 ± 10 meV is attributed to the S Cu defect level. In addition, the 1.21 eV emission peak has already been reported in our previous studies, 8,15) in which the transition from the S i level to the S Cu level is described. Therefore, the P1 peak emission is due to the transition from the S i level to the S Cu level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations