2018
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photon-counting CT: Technical Principles and Clinical Prospects

Abstract: Photon-counting CT is an emerging technology with the potential to dramatically change clinical CT. Photon-counting CT uses new energy-resolving x-ray detectors, with mechanisms that differ substantially from those of conventional energy-integrating detectors. Photon-counting CT detectors count the number of incoming photons and measure photon energy. This technique results in higher contrast-to-noise ratio, improved spatial resolution, and optimized spectral imaging. Photon-counting CT can reduce radiation ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
659
0
12

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 866 publications
(676 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
5
659
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of multi‐contrast imaging relies on the degree to which the acquired multi‐energy datasets represent unique distributions of photon energies. Limitations of PCD‐CT technology, such as K‐escape, charge sharing, and pulse pileup, cause the energy response of each energy bin to deviate considerably from the ideal response . The resulting imperfect separation of the acquired energy distributions (i.e., the presence of spectral overlap) degrades the performance of multi‐contrast imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance of multi‐contrast imaging relies on the degree to which the acquired multi‐energy datasets represent unique distributions of photon energies. Limitations of PCD‐CT technology, such as K‐escape, charge sharing, and pulse pileup, cause the energy response of each energy bin to deviate considerably from the ideal response . The resulting imperfect separation of the acquired energy distributions (i.e., the presence of spectral overlap) degrades the performance of multi‐contrast imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of PCD-CT technology, such as K-escape, charge sharing, and pulse pileup, cause the energy response of each energy bin to deviate considerably from the ideal response. [31][32][33][34] The resulting imperfect separation of the acquired energy distributions (i.e., the presence of spectral overlap) degrades the performance of multi-contrast imaging. With EID-based CT, DE datasets can be acquired by using two sets of tube/detector pairs (i.e., DSCT), with each pair operating at different tube potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy‐resolved photon‐counting detectors enable spectral computed tomography (CT) and continue to show promising developments . Several research prototypes have been developed, and studies comparing photon‐counting CT scanners to those with conventional energy integrating detectors have been performed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy-resolved photon-counting detectors enable spectral computed tomography (CT) and continue to show promising developments. 5 Several research prototypes have been developed, and studies comparing photon-counting CT scanners to those with conventional energy integrating detectors have been performed. 6,7 As the sensor and electronic technologies continue to advance, the clinical advantages of photon-counting CT, such as lower dose and increased contrast and material separability, may surpass that of scanners with conventional detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this advanced technology, ErCT can improve contrast-to-noise ratio, decrease electronic noise, and improve dose efficiency, compared with EiCT [1]. Due to technical limitation, clinical ErCT scanners are not yet commercially available, and they are in various stage of completion [2]. Therefore, this makes researchers less accessible to the ErCT images compared to the EiCT images available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%