1999
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.16.001066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photon diffusion coefficient in an absorbing medium

Abstract: A number of investigators have recently claimed, based on both analysis from transport theory and transporttheory-based Monte Carlo calculations, that the diffusion coefficient for photon migration should be taken to be independent of absorption. We show that these analyses are flawed and that the correct way of extracting diffusion theory from transport theory gives an absorption-dependent diffusion coefficient. Experiments by two different sets of investigators give conflicting results concerning whether the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be noted that it is yet to reach a consensus regarding whether the diffusion coefficient in steady-state measurement shall include the absorption coefficient. [29][30][31][32][33] We argue that, as the DPF is unbiasedly defined by the use of mean time of flight through time-dependent DE, the definition of DPF in steady-state may agree with the one in the time-resolved condition only if the diffusion coefficient is not dependent upon the absorption coefficient. Therefore, this study uses the diffusion coefficient as D ¼ 1∕ð3μ 0 s Þ.…”
Section: Geometries Considered and Analyticmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It must be noted that it is yet to reach a consensus regarding whether the diffusion coefficient in steady-state measurement shall include the absorption coefficient. [29][30][31][32][33] We argue that, as the DPF is unbiasedly defined by the use of mean time of flight through time-dependent DE, the definition of DPF in steady-state may agree with the one in the time-resolved condition only if the diffusion coefficient is not dependent upon the absorption coefficient. Therefore, this study uses the diffusion coefficient as D ¼ 1∕ð3μ 0 s Þ.…”
Section: Geometries Considered and Analyticmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Notice that here we take into account unavoidable losses to calculate ℓ ⋆ , as in Refs. [44][45][46]. For lossless scatterers σ ext = σ sca , so that ℓ ⋆ = ℓ sca /(1 − cos θ ), where ℓ sca = 1/(ρσ sca ) is the scattering mean free path.…”
Section: B Lorenz-mie Efficiencies and Multiple Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, l s is the scattering coefficient and g is the anisotropy factor, which equals the average cosine of the scattering angle. When the absorption coefficient is not small compared to the reduced scattering coefficient, the accuracy of the cw diffusion approximation decreases, as has been shown earlier [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Application of this latter approach led to discrepancies, because the results with this diffusion coefficient for the steady-state solution calculated with this approach are not in agreement with the more rigorous solution of the equation of transport [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The apparent diffusion coefficient of the diffusion equation, which is in agreement with the rigorous solution of the transport equation, depends on the absorption coefficient as well [10,11,23]. Furthermore, it depends on the phase function, which describes the angular distribution of the scatterers [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%