The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services Directorate for Information
SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)AFRL/RVBXT
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for Public Release; distribution unlimited.
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
ABSTRACTExperiments were carried out using a flowing-afterglow Langmuir-probe apparatus to measure rate constants for electron attachment to SF 6 and thermal detachment from SF 6 '. In a recent series of papers, these results were combined with new and existing data on nondissociative and dissociative attachment to SF 6 and compared to statistical modeling of the various processes involved in the stabilization of the ionic products of attachment. This paper gives a summary of those findings. The major conclusions are: (a) only the ground electronic state of SF 6 needs to be invoked to explain available data; (b) the electron affinity of SF 6 is higher than previously thought, namely, EA(SF 6 = 1.20 (± 0.05) eV; (c) the endothermicity of the dissociative electron attachment reaction that yields SF 5 " is 0.41 eV (± 0.05) eV at 0 K: (d) combining these two numbers gives the bond energy D 0°( F-SF 5 ") = 1.61 (± 0.05) eV. Abstract. Experiments were carried out using a flowing-afterglow Langmuir-probe apparatus to measure rate constants for electron attachment to SF 6 and thermal detachment from SF 6 '. In a recent series of papers, these results were combined with new and existing data on nondissociative and dissociative attachment to SF 6 and compared to statistical modeling of the various processes involved in the stabilization of the ionic products of attachment. This paper gives a summary of those findings. The major conclusions are: (a) only the ground electronic state of SF 6 " needs to be invoked to explain available data; (b) the electron affinity of SF« is higher than previously thought, namely, EA(SF