2023
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2022.0543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photonic ternary quantum random number generators

Abstract: We construct a class of three-dimensional photonic quantum random number generators (QRNGs) and prove that each of them generates maximally unpredictable digits via measurements that are robust to errors. This shows that every sequence generated is strongly incomputable; hence its quality is provably better than that of every pseudo-random sequence. These results suggest that incomputability in physics is real and practically applicable. Finally, we present photonic implementations of three-dimensional QRNGs a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, using the Eigenstate principle and Theorem 5.6 in 14 , we deduce that the QRNG described above generates maximally unpredictable binary random digits.…”
Section: Quantum Versus Classical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, using the Eigenstate principle and Theorem 5.6 in 14 , we deduce that the QRNG described above generates maximally unpredictable binary random digits.…”
Section: Quantum Versus Classical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This section introduces the physical principles and assumptions on which the notion of being "better than any PRNG" operates 8,13,14 . We then proceed to an explicit example based on a configuration of observables that realizes a QRNG according to these principles.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Qrngsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All quantum random number generators, which rely on measuring value-indefinite observables [1][2][3] are three-dimensional. This is because the Kochen-Specker Theorem [4] is false in dimension two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%