2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2015.02.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photophysical study of a charge transfer oxazole dye in micelles: Role of surfactant headgroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the surface polarity increases from anionic to cationic to non‐ionic micelles . Accordingly, the non‐radiative deactivation rate decreases and the fluorescence quantum yield increases . All fluorescence lifetime values obtained were single‐exponential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the surface polarity increases from anionic to cationic to non‐ionic micelles . Accordingly, the non‐radiative deactivation rate decreases and the fluorescence quantum yield increases . All fluorescence lifetime values obtained were single‐exponential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…When the microviscosity values of the other micelles were examined, it was determined that the smallest values were in the TX‐100 micelle. This means that the interaction between the PyY molecule and the uncharged TX‐100 surfactant is very weak …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is to be noted that, due to two different kinds of interaction displayed by TB in different micellar stages, two different equations have been used to determine the association constant of TB to the pre micellar (>8 mM) and the micellar stage (8 mM) of SDS. For the interaction of TB with SDS in the pre micellar stage, the intensity gradually decreases due to the formation of ion‐pair complex (Figure 1) where the nonradiative process of electron transfer from TB to micelle is predominant [25] . This interaction can be modelled by the Stern Volmer Equation (equation 12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the interaction of TB with SDS in the pre micellar stage, the intensity gradually decreases due to the formation of ion-pair complex (Figure 1) where the nonradiative process of electron transfer from TB to micelle is predominant. [25] This interaction can be modelled by the Stern Volmer Equation (equation 12). However, in the micellar stage of SDS, as all the TB molecules are compartmentalized within the nonpolar core of micelles and are screened from the non-radiative processes which is predominant in bulk water, an enhancement of fluorescence intensity has been observed which has been modelled by the Benesi-Hildebrand equation (equation 13).…”
Section: Fitting Equation To Determine the Binding Constant Of Tb To ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uorescence lifetime (s 3 ) of ACYMAN becomes signicantly large in pure DODAB vesicles (2.82 ns) relative to aqueous buffer (average lifetime $ 0.34 ns), and originates from inhibition of non-radiative relaxation of the excited charge transfer (CT) state due to efficient screening of the dye from perturbation of water molecules. 26 In addition, upon an increase of the a Amplitude or intensity fraction of each decay component is shown within parentheses. MO content (c MO ) gradual increase of the uorescence lifetime (s 3 ) is observed in DODAB/MO mixed vesicles (Table 1) relative to pure DODAB vesicles because of increasingly more efficient screening of the dye from perturbation of water molecules in the former than the latter.…”
Section: Scheme 1 Dodab (A) Mo (B) and Acyman (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%