2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photospheric activity, rotation, and magnetic interaction in LHS 6343 A

Abstract: Context. The Kepler mission has recently discovered a brown dwarf companion transiting one member of the M4V+M5V visual binary system LHS 6343 AB with an orbital period of 12.71 days. Aims. The particular interest of this transiting system lies in the synchronicity between the transits of the brown dwarf C component and the main modulation observed in the light curve, which is assumed to be caused by rotating starspots on the A component. We model the activity of this star by deriving maps of the active region… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In analyzing the pipeline-generated light curve, we detected occasional anomalies during transit events, with the recorded flux systematically larger than expected. These anomalies were also detected by Herrero et al (2013), who attribute them to occultations of spots on LHS 6343 A by LHS 6343 C. The anomalies occur only in the long cadence data, and only when the transit is symmetric around one data point in the Kepler time series, so that the central in-transit flux measurement would be expected to be significantly lower than the surrounding data points. By investigating the pixel-level data, we find that each anomaly has been registered as a cosmic ray by the PA pipeline, and "corrected" to an artificially large value.…”
Section: Kepler Photometrymentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In analyzing the pipeline-generated light curve, we detected occasional anomalies during transit events, with the recorded flux systematically larger than expected. These anomalies were also detected by Herrero et al (2013), who attribute them to occultations of spots on LHS 6343 A by LHS 6343 C. The anomalies occur only in the long cadence data, and only when the transit is symmetric around one data point in the Kepler time series, so that the central in-transit flux measurement would be expected to be significantly lower than the surrounding data points. By investigating the pixel-level data, we find that each anomaly has been registered as a cosmic ray by the PA pipeline, and "corrected" to an artificially large value.…”
Section: Kepler Photometrymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Oshagh et al (2012) analyzed the lack of transit timing variations in the system, finding that any additional companions to LHS 6343 A with an orbital period smaller than 100 days must have a mass smaller than that of Jupiter. With 6 quarters of Kepler data, Herrero et al (2013) measured a photometric rotation period of 13.13 ± 0.02 days for LHS 6343 A. The authors also claimed to observe spotcrossing events during the transits of LHS 6343 A, as well as out-of-transit photometric modulation with a period consistent with the orbital period of LHS 6343 C. Herrero et al (2014) updated this work, concluding that the out-of-transit variations are dominated by relativistic Doppler beaming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Evidence of photospheric signatures associated with a possible magnetic star-planet interaction are reviewed by, e.g., Lanza (2011) considering also their possible connection with chromospheric and coronal signatures. Recently, Herrero et al (2013) have discussed further observations supporting the phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This phenomenon may be present and detectable in some systems (e.g. Pagano et al 2009;Herrero et al 2013) but not others (e.g. Miller et al 2012;Scandariato et al 2013), however, as the planets of interest for this work are distant (outside 0.3AU), such an interaction is likely to be very weak or absent.…”
Section: Sanchis-ojeda and Winn 2011mentioning
confidence: 92%