2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosynthetic gas exchange characteristics in three different almond species during drought stress and subsequent recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
77
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
77
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in photosynthetic rates are most likely to be observed under conditions of environmental stress (Earl and Tollenaar 1999), like e.g. drought (Rouhi et al 2007) and salinity (Ranjbarfordoei et al 2006). Most of the abiotic stresses are connected to anthropogenic activities which are clearly causing major changes in atmospheric chemistry and climate .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in photosynthetic rates are most likely to be observed under conditions of environmental stress (Earl and Tollenaar 1999), like e.g. drought (Rouhi et al 2007) and salinity (Ranjbarfordoei et al 2006). Most of the abiotic stresses are connected to anthropogenic activities which are clearly causing major changes in atmospheric chemistry and climate .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, plants respond to salinity at nonstomatal and/or stomatal levels. Nonstomatal responses include instability of pigment-protein complexes and destruction of chloroplast structure (Zaman et al 2002), which inhibits photosynthetic activities (Matos et al 2004, Rouhi et al 2006. At the stomatal level, the stomatal activity is reduced and it limits photosynthesis (Lawlor and Cornic 2002) and photon flux energy used for photochemistry (Cornic 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, under stress conditions, Ci tends to a decrease in its values, having in mind that the stomatal conductance is reduced, thus limiting the entry of CO 2 through the stomata. Such behavior has been observed in other studies conducted in Prunus by Martinazzo et al (2011Martinazzo et al ( , 2013, Rouhi et al (2007) and Pimentel et al (2014); and this study was discretely checked in plum trees cultivar 'Marianna 2624', on the first and second day of stress for the flooded plants and on the fourth and sixth days for water deficit treatment, where their obtained values differed in relation to the control plants. Different behavior was observed in plants of the rootstock 'Capdeboscq' submitted to flooding, where on the last day of evaluation (third and fourth) reached a significant increase in the values of Ci.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The same occurred in 'Julior' on the same days but for the water deficit treatment. According to Chaves et al (2009), an increase of Ci can be attributed to a heterogeneous stomatal closure and/or interference of the cuticular conductance; however, Rouhi et al (2007) attribute this fact to non-stomatal limitations. Rouhi et al (2007) also observed high leaf abscission in genotypes of Prunus compared to water deficit and also to which occurred in this study, the Ci values obtained significant increase under this condition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation