2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosynthetic response to green crown pruning in young plantation-grown Eucalyptus pilularis and E. cloeziana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…cx 4 ) fitted to the response of log 10 (total polyphenol concentration) (log 10 [TP]) in mature leaves above 1.5 m to log 10 (proportion of productive canopy volume missing as a result of shoot browsing ?1) for C. apiculatum taller than 2 m at Nkuhlu, 28-30 January 2008 Table 4 Parameters of linear models (y = a ? bx) fitted to (a) the response of log 10 (phosphorus concentration) to log 10 (total proportion of productive canopy volume removed by shoot browsing ?1), and (b) the response of log 10 (total polyphenol concentration) to log 10 (total proportion of productive canopy volume removed by shoot browsing ?1) for G. flavescens at Nkuhlu, 28-30 January 2008 increasing browsing intensity accumulate C from current photosynthate or storage (Medhurst et al 2006;Alcorn et al 2008;Olesen et al 2008). The primary C source in G. flavescens is not likely to be storage because the root system is not large; plants are easily uprooted by elephants, revealing shallow roots.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cx 4 ) fitted to the response of log 10 (total polyphenol concentration) (log 10 [TP]) in mature leaves above 1.5 m to log 10 (proportion of productive canopy volume missing as a result of shoot browsing ?1) for C. apiculatum taller than 2 m at Nkuhlu, 28-30 January 2008 Table 4 Parameters of linear models (y = a ? bx) fitted to (a) the response of log 10 (phosphorus concentration) to log 10 (total proportion of productive canopy volume removed by shoot browsing ?1), and (b) the response of log 10 (total polyphenol concentration) to log 10 (total proportion of productive canopy volume removed by shoot browsing ?1) for G. flavescens at Nkuhlu, 28-30 January 2008 increasing browsing intensity accumulate C from current photosynthate or storage (Medhurst et al 2006;Alcorn et al 2008;Olesen et al 2008). The primary C source in G. flavescens is not likely to be storage because the root system is not large; plants are easily uprooted by elephants, revealing shallow roots.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The middle portion of the crown has a higher photosynthetic rate than does the lower crown (Wong and Dunin 1987;Alcorn et al 2008b). Consequently, if pruning is too drastic and removes part of the middle crown, plant growth may be impaired because most assimilates are immediately allocated to support the rapid crown recovery at the expense of stem growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in the photosynthetic capacity may also be explained by basal crown shading because new foliage is promptly formed after pruning (Pinkard and Beadle 1998a). Alcorn et al (2008b) reported no photosynthetic rate increases between 6 and 13 months after pruning in Eucalyptus pilularis and Eucalyptus cloeziana probably because crown recovery had been completed before 6 months. The change in the root:foliage ratio may also explain the fast crown recovery after pruning.…”
Section: Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dark respiration at 25°C (mol·m −2 ·s −1 ) 0.3 to 3 Grassi et al 2002;Medlyn et al 2007;Alcorn et al 2008;Christina et al 2015; this study ␣ Quantum yield of electron transport (mol·mol −1 ) 0.2 to 0.4 Grassi et al 2002;Medlyn et al 2007;Christina et al 2015; this study Curvature parameter of the light response of photosynthesis (unitless) 0.2 to 1 Grassi et al 2002;Christina et al 2015 Marsden et al 2013;Christina et al 2015; this study…”
Section: Polynomial First-level Metamodelsmentioning
confidence: 98%