With more than a billion people lacking accessible drinking water, there is a critical need to convert nonpotable sources such as seawater to water suitable for human use. However, energy requirements of desalination plants account for half their operating costs, so alternative, lower energy approaches are equally critical. Membrane distillation (MD) has shown potential due to its low operating temperature and pressure requirements, but the requirement of heating the input water makes it energy intensive. Here, we demonstrate nanophotonicsenabled solar membrane distillation (NESMD), where highly localized photothermal heating induced by solar illumination alone drives the distillation process, entirely eliminating the requirement of heating the input water. Unlike MD, NESMD can be scaled to larger systems and shows increased efficiencies with decreased input flow velocities. Along with its increased efficiency at higher ambient temperatures, these properties all point to NESMD as a promising solution for household-or community-scale desalination.our billion people around the world face at least 1 month of water scarcity every year (1, 2). To meet increasing water demand, it has become necessary to exploit saline water, abundant in the ocean and in brackish aquifers, and convert it to potable water (3, 4). Presently, there are more than 18,000 water desalination plants operating in 150 countries, producing 86.8 × 10 6 m 3 of water per day, enough for 300 million people (5, 6). The annual energy consumed by these plants is nominally 75 TWh, accounting for 50% of their operating costs (7-9) and 0.4% of the world electric power consumption (10). The possibility of directly using renewable energy would reduce this highly demanding cost of operation and make affordable clean water more accessible around the world.Many of the current desalination techniques involve phase change, and thus are inherently energy intensive. Among these, membrane distillation (MD) has gained recent attention because it can distill water at lower temperatures than conventional distillation (i.e., boiling) and lower pressures than reverse osmosis (RO) (11-16). In the conventional direct-contact MD process, hot saline water (feed) and cold purified water (distillate) flow on opposite sides of a hydrophobic membrane (Fig. 1A). The temperature difference between the two flows produces a vapor pressure difference across the membrane, leading to (salt-free) water vapor transporting through the membrane from the warmer feed to the colder distillate, where it condenses. However, MD suffers from several inherent limitations. Heat transfer reduces the cross-membrane temperature difference, resulting in lower vapor flux across the membrane and thus lower efficiency. This temperature difference is further decreased along the length of the membrane module, resulting in a maximal usable length of a single module.When no recirculation or heat recovery is used, energy is also lost when hot feed water exits the membrane module. Heating the volume of feed wat...