2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photovoltaic/battery system sizing for rural electrification in Bolivia: Considering the suppressed demand effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy loss per full battery could have been less if we had considered batteries of greater capacity or a greater number of batteries in our sizing. However, increasing the number of batteries is a higher investment in comparison with PV modules (Benavente et al 2019 ). Figure 8 also shows that the energy loss due to temperature is 7.52%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy loss per full battery could have been less if we had considered batteries of greater capacity or a greater number of batteries in our sizing. However, increasing the number of batteries is a higher investment in comparison with PV modules (Benavente et al 2019 ). Figure 8 also shows that the energy loss due to temperature is 7.52%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as is clearly shown in the literature and observed in the field, one of the consequences of providing access to electricity is the increase in electricity demand itself. That is, the demand for electricity often increases with time [15,16,44]. Therefore, in time (sometimes, in less than a year), the perfectly dimensioned SHS becomes obsolete and untenable to cater to the growing demands of the user.…”
Section: Climbing the Electrification Ladder With Shsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PV module efficiency, battery charger efficiency and battery charging efficiency are dependent on the manufacturers, system configuration and also operating conditions. The values provided are conservative, at the lower end of the spectrum: the PV system power conversion efficiency was 13% [28], and the battery charger system efficiency was 80% [29]. The chosen values The PV potential was then compared with the energy required by some typified applications (Table 2).…”
Section: The City's Solar Bus Sheltersmentioning
confidence: 99%