Photovoltaic module calibration value versus optical air mass: the air mass function

Abstract

So‐called “air mass functions” of photovoltaic modules are used to approximate the effects of spectral responsivity and to correct short‐circuit current to or from a reference condition. These empirical functions are determined from outdoor measurements with test modules mounted on two‐axis solar trackers and then calculated from plots of normalized calibration value (short‐circuit current divided by total irradiance) versus optical air mass. Because they are incorporated into a number of photovoltaic system modeling and sizing software programs, the accuracy of the functions has direct implications for system costs. We discuss the assumptions associated with these functions that are generally not considered or ignored, and study their variability with respect to atmospheric constituents. The variability study included a 6‐month outdoor measurement on a crystalline‐Si module and a software simulation of the same module using a solar spectral irradiance model. We conclude that air mass functions depend on the measurement location and time, and therefore are not unique to a particular device. Also, using these functions introduces two distinct errors, the magnitudes of which are unknown without knowledge of spectral irradiance conditions. Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Performance monitoring and modeling of an uncovered photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) water collector

“…It is important to note that, although this simplified equation takes into account only the Air Mass, neglecting the effect of aerosols, precipitable water and clouds (Osterwald et al, 2014), it can be nonetheless considered a good approximation of the spectral factor. k g is the low irradiance correction factor, which takes into account the power losses due to the low irradiance behavior of the PV modules.…”

Spectral derates phenomena of atmospheric components on multi-junction CPV technologies

“…Although AM requires few input parameters, it is device-independent and requires clear-sky conditions for accurate forecasting [15]. Although other limitations exist in the use of this parameter [17], one outstanding observation is the morning to afternoon disparity in measured Isc that exists for varying AM and module technologies. An example of this can be seen in Fig.…”

“…It is defined as the ratio of irradiance-specific current produced under an arbitrary spectrum to the irradiance-specific current produced under the reference ASTM G173 [7]. A value of M greater than 1.0 indicates a gain in short circuit current, compared to irradiance-specific current produced under the ASTM G173 spectrum [17]. Another method to quantify the 'blueness' or 'redness' of outdoor spectrum, is to use the average photon energy (APE) parameter, defined as the ratio of measured spectral irradiance divided by the integrated photon flux density [18].…”

Effect of Spectral Irradiance Variations on the Performance of Highly Efficient Environment-Friendly Solar Cells

“…Among the different parameters that affect the spectral distribution of the solar irradiance, AM, aerosol optical depth (AOD) (usually evaluated at 500 or 550 nm), and precipitable water have been identified as the ones with the highest impact on photovoltaic devices [33]- [35]. For better understanding the influence of spectral variations on the performance of the cells under study, an individualized analysis of the impact of each atmospheric parameter is conducted.…”