2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.0107-055x.2007.00058.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phyllotaxis of vegetative shoots, lamina rotation and their systematic implication in Magnoliaceae

Abstract: Phyllotaxis in vegetative shoots and lamina rotation of Magnoliaceae are described. Most genera in Magnoliaceae investigated (except Parakmeria, Manglietiastrum and Pachylarnax) show lamina rotation. Paraphoric, a new type of lamina rotation differing from four other types depicted by Charlton is clarified. Manglietia, Parakmeria, Manglietiastrum, Talauma, section Gwillimia and Rytidospermum in subgenus Magnolia, shoots of Woonyoungia, section Theorhodon and Liriodendron have spiral phyllotaxis, however Magnol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, in Fig. 1 it can be seen that distichy is also present in the vegetative shoots of magnolia [59]. Among many other primeval traits it is likely evidence of the common ancestry of this early divergent lineage of flowering plants and monocots [19,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Here, in Fig. 1 it can be seen that distichy is also present in the vegetative shoots of magnolia [59]. Among many other primeval traits it is likely evidence of the common ancestry of this early divergent lineage of flowering plants and monocots [19,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Based on overlap of many morphological characters, Nooteboom (2000) and Figlar and Nooteboom (2004) merged Manglietia with Magnolia L. However, numerous studies of e.g. karyomorphology (Meng et al 2006, Zhang and Xia 2007), molecular data (Azuma et al 2000, 2001, Shi et al 2000, Ueda et al 2000, Kim et al 2001, Wang et al 2006, Nie et al 2008), morphological cladistic analysis (Li and Conran 2003), cross‐compatibility (Gong et al 2001), and morphological characters (Baranova 1972, Tucker 1977, Liao and Xia 2007) support that Manglietia should be treated as a distinct genus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on overlap of many morphological characters, Nooteboom (2000) and Figlar and Nooteboom (2004) merged Manglietia with Magnolia L. However, numerous studies of e.g. karyomorphology (Meng et al 2006, Zhang and, molecular data (Azuma et al 2000, Shi et al 2000, Ueda et al 2000, Kim et al 2001, Wang et al 2006, Nie et al 2008, morphological cladistic analysis (Li and Conran 2003), cross-compatibility (Gong et al 2001), and morphological characters (Baranova 1972, Tucker 1977, Liao and Xia 2007) support that Manglietia should be treated as a distinct genus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%