2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02030-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic analysis and haplotype diversity in Christian residents of Lahore, Pakistan, using 17 Y-chromosomal STR loci

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other Pakistani Populations were distantly associated like Sindhi grouped with North Indian Balmiki; Balochi and Yousafzai Pathan shared genetic association to Caucasian, Uganda and African American. Similarly, a neighbour joining tree was constructed using our published 17-YSTRs data 9 of studied population and 16 reference populations based upon R ST p-values. Pairwise R ST p-values were calculated through AMOVA using online YHRD tool.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other Pakistani Populations were distantly associated like Sindhi grouped with North Indian Balmiki; Balochi and Yousafzai Pathan shared genetic association to Caucasian, Uganda and African American. Similarly, a neighbour joining tree was constructed using our published 17-YSTRs data 9 of studied population and 16 reference populations based upon R ST p-values. Pairwise R ST p-values were calculated through AMOVA using online YHRD tool.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize that this population must be targeted as a whole, to understand the genetic context of Christians and its connection to the greater Eurasian continent. Hence, Lahore-Christian samples were evaluated based on fifteen autosomal STRs of Identifiler Plus Kit (Applied Biosystems) and already published data set of same male samples (YA004381) 9 on 17 YSTRs (DYS438, DYS393, DYS385a⁄b, DYS389I⁄II, DYS458, DYS437, DYS391, DYS392, DYS635 (Y-GATA-C4), Y-GATA-H4, DYS19, DYS390, DYS439, DYS456, DYS448). To affirm phylogenetic affiliations of this population, data sets were compared with referenced populations as given in Table 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%