2000
DOI: 10.2307/3079015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Analysis of Dioecy in Monocotyledons

Abstract: Surveys of plant breeding systems in angiosperm families have shown a significant association between monoecy and dioecy, and researchers have proposed that dioecy has tended to evolve from monoecy. We evaluated this hypothesis in the context of a phylogeny of 918 monocotyledons assembled from 19 published trees. Binary and multistate breeding system characters were mapped onto a set of composite trees, and alternative models of character change were compared using maximum likelihood. Over a range of tree topo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is, to our knowledge, the first study that reports an association between these reproductive systems at such a broad scale; this association is consistent with the gynodioecy pathway (but does not rule out the monoecy pathway; see below). Because we could not use phylogenetic methods to study character evolution, our results may also be explained by the existence of 'hotspots' of unrelated reproductive system transitions (Weiblen et al, 2000). Indeed, factors that favour dioecy, i.e.…”
Section: The Routes To Dioecymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is, to our knowledge, the first study that reports an association between these reproductive systems at such a broad scale; this association is consistent with the gynodioecy pathway (but does not rule out the monoecy pathway; see below). Because we could not use phylogenetic methods to study character evolution, our results may also be explained by the existence of 'hotspots' of unrelated reproductive system transitions (Weiblen et al, 2000). Indeed, factors that favour dioecy, i.e.…”
Section: The Routes To Dioecymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The approach described above is known to be sensitive to phylogenetic inertia (Weiblen et al, 2000), which has stimulated the development of methods such as Bayestraits, BiSSE and MuSSE for studying character evolution on a phylogeny (Pagel et al, 2004;Pagel and Meade, 2006;Maddison et al, 2007;FitzJohn et al, 2009). Bayestraits, however, assumes equal diversification rates in a phylogenetic tree, an assumption that is very often not fulfilled (Magallon and Sanderson, 2010).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modular, colonial organisms are unusual because the "organism" is comprised of many replicated, interdependent modules, each with its own birth and death rates, complicating analyses of life-history patterns. Modularity can potentially lead to a diverse array of sexual systems (Weiblen et al 2000). However, unlike flowering plants (Barrett 1998) and some unitary animals (Francis 1992), there are essentially only two sexual systems in scleractinians.…”
Section: Systematic Patterns In Reproductive Biology Of Scleractinianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach that has been employed (e.g., Weiblen et al 2000, 2006, Ree and Donoghue 1999, Beaulieu et al 2007, Novotny et al 2010) is simply to piece together, by hand, trees from the ''best'' studies in the literature. This is effectively the approach that underlies the Tree of Life Web Project Maddison 1996, Maddison andSchulz 2007), and, for plants, Phylomatic (Webb and Donoghue 2005), as well as the APWeb (Stevens 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%