2017
DOI: 10.1111/syen.12229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic position of a remarkable new fideliine bee from northern Chile (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)

Abstract: Fideliine bees are an archaic group with a disjunct distribution mostly restricted to deserts of South America and South Africa. This group was previously thought to be more diverse in Africa than in South America, where only one genus (Neofidelia) comprising five species is known. Here we describe a species belonging to a second South American genus: Xenofidelia colorada Packer gen. et sp.n., from northern Chile. The species is illustrated and its phylogenetic position within Megachilidae is assessed using mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, describing new taxa (especially higher-level taxa) from single specimens, although sometimes unavoidable, is undesirable. If unavoidable, such nomenclatural acts should be thoroughly justified, for example, within a phylogenetic context for changes proposed at the supraspecific level, preferably with both molecular and morphological support (e.g., as in Packer et al 2017). The inherent problem of describing new taxa from single specimens is that observed differences are assumed to be interspecific (and in the case of new genera also intergeneric), since intraspecific (and in the case of new genera also intrageneric) variation is not known (Wiens & Servedio 2000;Wiens 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, describing new taxa (especially higher-level taxa) from single specimens, although sometimes unavoidable, is undesirable. If unavoidable, such nomenclatural acts should be thoroughly justified, for example, within a phylogenetic context for changes proposed at the supraspecific level, preferably with both molecular and morphological support (e.g., as in Packer et al 2017). The inherent problem of describing new taxa from single specimens is that observed differences are assumed to be interspecific (and in the case of new genera also intergeneric), since intraspecific (and in the case of new genera also intrageneric) variation is not known (Wiens & Servedio 2000;Wiens 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We proposed 24 new character statements for the Augochlorini phylogeny based on internal structures of the mesosoma, and they provided a considerable aid to elucidate the relationships of the group when analysed together with external morphological characters. These structures were already demonstrated as useful for reconstructions in various systematic levels, for example Hexapoda (Friedrich & Beutel ), Hymenoptera (Vilhelmsen, ,b; Vilhelmsen, Miko, & Krogmann, ), Apoidea (Melo, ) and Apidae (Packer et al., ; Porto, Almeida et al., ; Silveira, ). Therefore, we conclude that internal characters should be more explored in bee morphological phylogenetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal anatomy remains a largely untapped resource for evidence of evolutionary history (Deans, Mikó, Wipfler, & Friedrich, ). For examples of inclusion of characters derived from internal structures, see Packer, Litman and Praz () and Praz and Packer (). Recently, Porto, Almeida et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21). This area has yielded many interesting species of Apoidea in recent years, including a new genus of fideliine (Praz and Packer 2017) and a new species of Colletes (Ferrari 2017) as well as its presumptive cleptoparasite, a recently described species of Isepeolus (Packer and Graham 2020).…”
Section: Cresson Mariasteamentioning
confidence: 99%