2003
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.5.777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetics of Cranichideae with emphasis on Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae, Orchidoideae): evidence from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences

Abstract: DNA sequences from plastid rbcL and matK genes and the trnL-F region, as well as the nuclear ribosomal ITS region, were used to evaluate monophyly and subtribal delimitation of Cranichideae and generic relationships in Spiranthinae. Cranichideae are moderately supported as monophyletic, with Chloraeinae and Pterostylis-Megastylis indicated as their collective sisters. Within Cranichideae, Pachyplectroninae and Goodyerinae form a well-supported monophyletic group sister to a "core spiranthid" clade that include… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
149
2
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
19
149
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Amplification of matK was carried out in the same manner as Salazar et al (2003), using the 50 l reaction method with PCR master mix. In addition to the ÏȘ19F and 2R primers used to amplify the whole matK-trnK region, the internal primers 390F and 1326R were also used for some problematic amplifications and all sequencing (CuĂ©noud et al 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplification of matK was carried out in the same manner as Salazar et al (2003), using the 50 l reaction method with PCR master mix. In addition to the ÏȘ19F and 2R primers used to amplify the whole matK-trnK region, the internal primers 390F and 1326R were also used for some problematic amplifications and all sequencing (CuĂ©noud et al 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference vouchers for collections used in the study are housed either at CANB or CHR. Taxa were chosen on the basis of previous broader-level studies by Cameron et al (1999), Clements et al 2002), Cameron (2004), Salazar et al (2003Salazar et al ( , 2009) and GĂłrniak et al (2010).…”
Section: Taxon Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generic separateness of Ponthieva is not in doubt despite the general discussion about the infratribal classification of Cranichidinae (Szlachetko 1995;SalazĂĄr et al 2003SalazĂĄr et al , 2009). The unique characters of Ponthieva, which easily distinguish them from other cranichioid orchids are the petiolate, thin leaves, membranaceous floral bracts, often pubescent sepals with free or variously connate lateral sepals, strongly asymmetric petals adnate to the gynostemium and inserted on it and fleshy, usually prominently clawed, relatively small lip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%