2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenomics, biogeography, and adaptive radiation of grapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
70
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
8
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results are consistent with the Vitis genus being slow-evolving [ 28 , 29 ]. The radiation the Vitis genus (including subgenera Vitis and Muscadinia ) from a dioecious ancestor took place 28 to 54 MY ago [ 30 , 31 ]. Previous work suggested that the V. sylvestris sex locus might be shared with other Vitis species [ 4 , 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our results are consistent with the Vitis genus being slow-evolving [ 28 , 29 ]. The radiation the Vitis genus (including subgenera Vitis and Muscadinia ) from a dioecious ancestor took place 28 to 54 MY ago [ 30 , 31 ]. Previous work suggested that the V. sylvestris sex locus might be shared with other Vitis species [ 4 , 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further surveyed more than 1300 accessions belonging to 16 Vitis species of USDA Vitis germplasm for the presence or absence of the AMAT promoter indels by genomic PCR with indel specific primers (Table S17 and Supplementary note 2). We also searched the publically available genome sequencing data of 123 V. vinifera cultivars, 44 V. sylvestris accessions, 48 Vitis hybrids, and 128 accessions covering 48 wild Vitis species for these AMAT structral variations 23,27,28,[39][40][41][42][43][44] (Table S18). AMAT alleles with absence of the 426-bp and 42-bp sequences were detected only in V. labrusca and its related hybrids (Tables S17 and S18).…”
Section: Promoter Indels and Their Impacts On Amat Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, there is incongruence among studies concerning the monophyly of the taxa of Vitis subgenus Vitis in North America (cf. Wan et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2016;Ma et al, 2018a;Wen et al, 2018a). Nevertheless, several studies have resolved Vitis subgenus Vitis into two main clades corresponding to their geographic distributional areas in Eurasia and North America (e.g., Zecca et al, 2012;Klein et al, 2018;Ma et al, 2018b;Wen et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%