2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny and biogeography of a shallow water fish clade (Teleostei: Blenniiformes)

Abstract: BackgroundThe Blenniiformes comprises six families, 151 genera and nearly 900 species of small teleost fishes closely associated with coastal benthic habitats. They provide an unparalleled opportunity for studying marine biogeography because they include the globally distributed families Tripterygiidae (triplefin blennies) and Blenniidae (combtooth blennies), the temperate Clinidae (kelp blennies), and three largely Neotropical families (Labrisomidae, Chaenopsidae, and Dactyloscopidae). However, interpretation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(153 reference statements)
4
53
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, we investigate the evolution of tooth shape and diet within Blenniidae, a clade of small fish common on coral and rocky reefs, tidepools, and similar habitats in tropical and warm temperate zones. Blennies are part of a larger clade, the Blenniodei, containing families Chaenopsidae, Dactyloscopidae, Labrisomidae, Trypterygiidae, and Blenniidae (Lin and Hastings 2013). All blennies appear to have oral teeth that meet the Bellwood et al (2014) criteria for specialization for detrivorous feeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, we investigate the evolution of tooth shape and diet within Blenniidae, a clade of small fish common on coral and rocky reefs, tidepools, and similar habitats in tropical and warm temperate zones. Blennies are part of a larger clade, the Blenniodei, containing families Chaenopsidae, Dactyloscopidae, Labrisomidae, Trypterygiidae, and Blenniidae (Lin and Hastings 2013). All blennies appear to have oral teeth that meet the Bellwood et al (2014) criteria for specialization for detrivorous feeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the pitfalls of phylogenomics is the potential for the inference of a strongly supported, but erroneous, phylogeny because systematic error increases as more data is used [24, 35]. Such error does not appear to be confounding the support for monophyly of major Ovalentaria lineages, as many of these clades are consistently supported in several other phylogenetic studies [8, 33, 34, 40, 42, 49, 54]. However, stochastic error, systematic error and non-phylogenetic signal can also lead to low node support [12, 59], as observed in the lack of phylogenetic resolution among the major lineages of Ovalentaria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting equally parsimonious trees were summarized using the strict consensus method, and nodal support was estimated from 1,000 replicates of the bootstrap, utilizing random addition sequence and TBR branch swapping (Swofford 2002). The outgroup for both analyses was Cirripectes quagga, which was selected based on its position as a basal member of the sister group of Ecsenius in the phylogeny of Lin & Hastings (2013). Istiblennius edentulus, a less basal member of this sister group, was also included in the analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%