Phylogeny, Ecology, and Heart Position in Snakes

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Online enhancements: data file, appendixes. ABSTRACTThe cardiovascular system of all animals is affected by gravitational pressure gradients, the intensity of which varies according to organismic features, behavior, and habitat occupied. A previous nonphylogenetic analysis of heart position in snakes-which often assume vertical postures-found the heart located 15%-25% of total body length from the head in terrestrial and arboreal species but 25%-45% in aquatic species. It was hypothesized that a more anterior heart in arboreal species served to reduce the hydrostatic blood pressure when these animals adopt vertical postures during climbing, whereas an anterior heart position would not be needed in aquatic habitats, where the effects of gravity are less pronounced. We analyzed a new data set of 155 species from five major families of Alethinophidia (one of the two major branches of snakes, the other being blind snakes, Scolecophidia) using both conventional and phylogenetically based statistical methods. General linear models regressing log 10 snout-heart position on log 10 snout-vent length (SVL), as well as dummy variables coding for habitat and/or clade, were compared using likelihood ratio tests and the Akaike Information Criterion. Heart distance to the tip of the snout scaled isometrically with SVL. In all instances, phylogenetic models that incorporated transformation of the branch lengths under an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model of evolution (to mimic stabilizing selection) better fit the data as compared with their nonphylogenetic counterparts. The bestfit model predicting snake heart position included aspects of both habitat and clade and indicated that arboreal snakes in our study tend to have hearts placed more posteriorly, opposite the trend identified in previous studies. Phylogenetic signal in relative heart position was apparent both within and among clades. Our results suggest that overcoming gravitational pressure gradients in snakes most likely involves the combined action of several cardiovascular and behavioral adaptations in addition to alterations in relative heart location.

Island tameness: living on islands reduces flight initiation distance

“…Alpha was 0.05. Akaike's information criterion corrected for sample size (AIC c ) was used initially to assess explanatory merits of the models [34].…”

Phylogenetic analysis of mammalian maximal oxygen consumption during exercise

“…Similar tests can be used to compare the fit of models within the OLS, PGLS or RegOU classes when they contain nested subsets of independent variables (e.g. Lavin et al, 2008;Gartner et al, 2010).…”

“…We utilized a model selection approach to objectively choose among models corresponding to different combinations of adaptive hypotheses for each of the regression methods (OLS, PGLS and RegOU) (e.g. see Gartner et al, 2010). For each model, we report the ln maximum likelihood, Akaike information criterion [AIC=(−2×ln maximum likelihood)+(2×number of parameters)], and AIC corrected for small sample size [AICc=(−2×ln maximum likelihood)+(2×p×n/(n-p-1)], where p is the number of parameters and n is the sample size (in these formulations, smaller numbers indicate better-fitting models) (see Burnham and Anderson, 2002).…”

Are Voluntary Wheel Running and Open-Field Behavior Correlated in Mice? Different Answers from Comparative and Artificial Selection Approaches

“…We tested for any effect of these mutations on wheel running and open-field behavior using RegressionV2.m (Lavin et al 2008). We used a phylogenetic generalized least squares model in which the regression coefficients and the strength of phylogenetic signal in the residuals were estimated (Restricted Maximum Likelihood) simultaneously assuming an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) evolutionary process along the phylogenetic tree (sensu Swanson and Garland 2009;Gartner et al 2010). The OU model is often used to model stabilizing selection (Garland et al 1993;Hansen 1997;Butler and King 2004).…”