2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00210-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of holoparasitic Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) inferred from nuclear ITS sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
122
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
18
122
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined data hypothesis is less resolved with lower support values, which could be caused by the very high substitution rate of ITS1 and ITS2, even for the greater taxon sampling used in Yuan et al (2004), resulting in the suppression of the phylogenetic signal of the atpB-rbcL dataset (Mansion and Struwe 2004;Schneeweiss et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined data hypothesis is less resolved with lower support values, which could be caused by the very high substitution rate of ITS1 and ITS2, even for the greater taxon sampling used in Yuan et al (2004), resulting in the suppression of the phylogenetic signal of the atpB-rbcL dataset (Mansion and Struwe 2004;Schneeweiss et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were grouped in the aggregate O. minor (7,9,12). According to Musselman (17,18) this aggregate consists of only one species, which displays wide morphological variability caused by the host plant and is poorly resolved even by broad-scale molecular phylogenetic analyses (16,23,26).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…†purpurea is highly variable, so its taxonomic status needs to be verified within its range. Molecular analysis of specimens collected in various regions revealed a very high sequence divergence between several accessions, suggesting the presence of more than one taxon within this species (Schneeweiss et al 2004). Many lower taxonomic units have already been distinguished (but often not defined clearly) on the basis of flower number, inflorescence shape, flower morphology (e.g.…”
Section: Taxonomic Notesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many lower taxonomic units have already been distinguished (but often not defined clearly) on the basis of flower number, inflorescence shape, flower morphology (e.g. length and shape of corolla lips or calyx teeth), hairiness of individual parts, and colour (Beck 1890(Beck , 1930 (CarlÛn et al 2005;Schneeweiss et al 2004). Experiments on alternating cultivation of these 2 †species on Achillea spp.…”
Section: Taxonomic Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%