2017
DOI: 10.1111/cla.12203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of Riama (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae), impact of phenotypic evidence on molecular datasets, and the origin of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta endemic fauna

Abstract: Riama is the most speciose genus of the Neotropical lizard family Gymnophthalmidae. Its more than 30 montane species occur throughout the northern Andes, the Cordillera de la Costa (CC) in Venezuela, and Trinidad. We present the most comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Riama to date based on a total evidence (TE) approach and direct optimization of molecular and morphological evidence. Analyses use DNA sequences from four loci and 35 phenotypic characters. The dataset consists of 55 ingroup terminals repres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(238 reference statements)
3
13
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our phylogenetic ML ( Figure 2) tree inferred using fragments of four mitochondrial and one nuclear gene is congruent with other studies [6,11,12,51,52], except that it recovered the monophyly of Proctoporus and that the recently described genus Wilsonosaura is nested within the Proctoporus lineage (Bootstrap: 76). However, trees using only mitochondrial ( Figure S1) and nuclear ( Figure S2) markers are not congruent.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our phylogenetic ML ( Figure 2) tree inferred using fragments of four mitochondrial and one nuclear gene is congruent with other studies [6,11,12,51,52], except that it recovered the monophyly of Proctoporus and that the recently described genus Wilsonosaura is nested within the Proctoporus lineage (Bootstrap: 76). However, trees using only mitochondrial ( Figure S1) and nuclear ( Figure S2) markers are not congruent.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The ML topology obtained in this study using concatenated sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear genes recovered the monophyly of Proctoporus and included the genus Wilsonosaura within Proctoporus. This topology contrasts with previous studies that did not support the monophyly of Proctoporus, suggesting additional studies are needed to solve the taxonomy and phylogenetic position of Proctoporus [6,11,12,51,52]. Moreover, our study considered 129 terminals and addressed the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of the three species of Cercosaura (Cercosaura anomala, "Cercosaura manicata boliviana", and Cercosaura pacha sp.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Nonetheless, all species of Macropholidus and Pholidobolus examined to date share a bulge marking the margins of the asulcate face (Nunes, 2011;Torres-Carvajal et al, 2014;Venegas et al, 2016, Parra et al, 2020), which we propose as a putative synapomorphy of the clade Macropholidus + Pholidobolus as it has not been described in other species of Cercosaurine lizards. The conservative hemipenial morphology of this clade contrasts with the variation reported in some clades of gymnophthalmid lizards, in which hemipenes bear diagnostic characters at the species level (e.g., Nunes et al, 2012;Rodrigues et al, 2017;Kok et al, 2018). Only a more comprehensive examination of the hemipenes within the Cercosaurinae will shed some light on their evolution.…”
Section: Etymologycontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…More than one third of the known diversity within Cercosaurinae (i.e., 52 of 147 species) has only been discovered during this century, at a rate of ~2.5 species per year. In addition, recent DNA-based phylogenetic studies have provided major insights into the phylogeny of Cercosaurinae along with numerous taxonomic changes including new generic names and new combinations (e.g., Castoe et al, 2004;Doan and Castoe, 2005;Goicoechea et al, 2012;Sánchez-Pacheco et al, 2017;Moravec et al, 2018). In this context, the sister clades Pholidobolus Peters, 1863 andMacropholidus Noble, 1921, traditionally ranked as genera, were recently redefined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A otimização direta testa possíveis hipóteses de homologia dos nucleotídeos de forma dinâmica, otimizando as sequências não-alinhadas diretamente nas árvores disponíveis, ao mesmo tempo em que converte as séries de transformação pré-alinhadas, frutos da otimização (i.e., os nucleotídeos alinhados), em uma matriz estática (Kluge & Grant, 2006;Grant & Kluge, 2009;Sánchez-Pacheco et al, 2017 (Wheeler, 1995;Kluge, 1997Kluge, , 1998Giribet, 2003;Grant & Kluge, 2005;Giribet & Wheeler, 2007;ver um (Goloboff, 1996); Ratchet (Nixon, 1999); e Tree Fusing (Goloboff, 1999 As medidas de suporte calculadas foram Goodman-Bremer (Goodman et al, 1982;Bremer, 1988;Grant & Kluge, 2008) e Bootstrap (Felsenstein, 1985). Os cálculos das medidas de suporte foram feitos no TNT (Goloboff et al, 2003(Goloboff et al, , 2008 As análises baseadas somente em caracteres morfológicos foram realizadas no programa TNT, através de busca heurística usando o algoritmo TBR, com 1000 replicações e salvando 100 árvores por réplica.…”
Section: Análises De Parcimôniaunclassified