2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of the Callandrena subgenus of Andrena (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data: Polyphyly and convergent evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This generated a subset of ''better'' trees which was used as the starting point for a second MP analysis in which only this subset was swapped to completion (hsearch start = current chuckscore = no). (Edgecombe et al, 2000;Larkin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Partitioned Bremer Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This generated a subset of ''better'' trees which was used as the starting point for a second MP analysis in which only this subset was swapped to completion (hsearch start = current chuckscore = no). (Edgecombe et al, 2000;Larkin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Partitioned Bremer Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes analyzed 2.3.1. Elongation factor 1-a Elongation factor 1-a (hereafter EF) has been widely used to infer bee phylogeny (e. g., Danforth et al, 2004Danforth et al, , 2006bLarkin et al, 2006;Schwarz et al, 2006;Cameron et al, 2007;Patiny et al, 2007). We amplified two overlapping fragments of the F2 copy of this gene (Danforth and Ji, 1998).…”
Section: Dna Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies now incorporating both nuclear and mitochondrial genes provide complementary data for resolving phylogenetics as the two types of data can be considered independent or unlinked (Caterino et al 2000, Arias and Sheppard 2005, Zhang et al 2005, Larkin et al 2006, Kiyoshi and Sota 2006, Patsoula et al 2006). In the same manner, combining morphological and molecular character information can result in complementary analyses that can produce a more robust systematics study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%