Phylogeny of the Neotropical sages (Salvia subg. Calosphace; Lamiaceae) and insights into pollinator and area shifts

Fragoso-Martínez, Itzi; Martínez-Gordillo, Martha; Salazar, Gerardo A.; Sazatornil, Federico; Jenks, Aaron A.; Peña, María Del Rosario García; Barrera-Aveleida, Giovanna; Benitez‐Vieyra, Santiago; Magallón, Susana; Cornejo‐Tenorio, Guadalupe; Mendoza, Carolina Granados

doi:10.1007/s00606-017-1445-4

Cited by 66 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Se han publicado estudios sobre tipificación de especies (Ramamoorthy 1983, 1984, Lara-Cabrera & García-Peña 2008, un catálogo de sinónimos (Alziar 1992) y notas nomenclaturales (González-Gallegos & Gama-Villanueva 2013, González-Gallegos 2015a), entre otros. Se han logrado avances sustanciales en el entendimiento de sus relaciones filogenéticas (Walker et al 2004, Walker & Sytsma 2007, Drew et al 2017, Fragoso-Martínez et al 2017a. En adición, se han realizado algunos estudios cromosómicos (Epling et al 1962, Palomino et al 1986, Mercado et al 1989, anatómicos (Ceja-Romero et al 2005, Castro-Morales 2008, genéticos (Cahill 2004), quí-micos (Wasson 1962, Sánchez et al 1989, Argumedo et al 2003 (Dieringer et al 1991, Claßen-Bockhoff et al 2004, Wester & Claßen-Bockhoff 2006, Arizmendi et al 2007, Benitez-Vieyra et al 2014, Cuevas & Rosas-Guerrero 2016.…”

Section: Martha Martínez-gordillo Et Alunclassified

“…LAMIACEAE DE MÉXICO 2007, Drew et al 2017, Fragoso-Martínez et al 2017a. En adición, se han realizado algunos estudios cromosómicos (Epling et al 1962, Palomino et al 1986, Mercado et al 1989 Respecto a Scutellaria, se tiene una revisión taxonómica (Epling 1942) y notas complementarias para las especies americanas (Leonard 1927, Epling 1939b, c, Harley & Paton 1999, además de una revisión de la sección Resinosa (Turner 1994a), y para la misma, se cuenta con un estudio anatómico de los mericarpos (Turner & Reveal 2004).…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lamiaceae de México

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenAntecedentes: Lamiaceae es una de las familias con mayor riqueza de especies en México. Sin embargo, aún se carece de un estudio detallado sobre su diversidad en el país y de una revisión taxonómica global y actualizada. Como resultado, el aprovechamiento y conservación de los integrantes de esta familia es limitado. Preguntas: ¿Qué avances se han logrado en el estudio y entendimiento de la riqueza, endemismo y distribución de las Lamiaceae mexicanas? ¿Qué estrategias deben ejecutarse para consolidar el conocimiento de la familia en el país? Taxon: Lamiaceae Sitio de estudio: México Métodos: Se hizo una revisión exhaustiva de las Lamiaceae mexicanas en la literatura, bases de datos y herbarios. Se sintetizó el estado de su conocimiento. Se aplicaron análisis cuantitativos para evaluar su riqueza, endemismo y distribución geográfica. Resultados: México cuenta con 33 géneros y 598 especies, de las cuales el 66.2 % son endémicas. El género más diverso es Salvia, con 306 especies. El estado más diverso es Oaxaca, mientras que Jalisco alberga el mayor número de especies endémicas. Conclusiones: En México, Lamiaceae es la octava familia más diversa y el número de sus especies representa el 5.5 % de la familia a nivel mundial, por lo que el país puede considerarse uno de los centros de diversificación más importante. Debido a lo anterior, y al endemismo elevado que presenta, México es crucial para la conservación in situ de la familia. Si bien se ha logrado un avance considerable de su conocimiento y en la actualidad hay un repunte en su estudio, es necesario diversificar los campos de investigación. Palabras clave: distribución geográfica, endemismo, Lamiaceae mexicanas, riqueza florística. AbstractBackground: Lamiaceae is one of the most species-rich families in Mexico. However, a detailed treatment on its diversity and an updated comprehensive taxonomic review for the country are still lacking. As a result, the use and conservation of the members of Lamiaceae is limited. Questions: Which advances have been achieved on the study and understanding of the Mexican Lamiaceae in terms of richness, endemism and distribution? Which strategies should be applied to enhance the knowledge of Lamiaceae in Mexico? Taxon: Lamiaceae Study site: Mexico Methods: A thorough review of Mexican Lamiaceae in the literature, databases and herbaria was conducted. The state of knowledge of the family was summarized. Quantitative analyses were performed to assess its richness, endemism and geographical distribution. Results: Mexico embraces 33 genera and 598 species of Lamiaceae, with an endemism proportion of 66.2 %. The most diverse genus is Salvia, with 306 species. Oaxaca is the state encompassing the highest richness, whereas Jalisco harbors the highest amount of endemic species. Conclusions: In Mexico Lamiaceae is the eighth most species-rich family, with a number of species equivalent to 5.5 % of all Lamiaceae worldwide; hence the country is one of the most relevant diversification centers for the family. The high species richne...

show abstract

Section: Martha Martínez-gordillo Et Alunclassified

unclassified

Lamiaceae de México

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Within Salviinae, Drew & Sytsma () suggested an extensive radiation and dispersal of Salvia from Europe to the New World, some 14–10 mya. Further, Salvia subgenus Calosphace originated in Mexico and Central America (Fragoso‐Martínez et al, ) and Salvia section Membranaceae , with 12 species, is almost exclusive to Mexico (González‐Gallegos, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Richness, geographic distribution patterns, and areas of endemism of selected angiosperm groups in Mexico

Rodríguez

Castro‐Castro

Vargas-Amado

et al. 2018

J of Sytematics Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mexico is a megadiverse country. Presently, 22 126 species of angiosperms have been registered within its territory and 11 001 are considered to be endemic. However, their geographical distributions are far from homogeneous. In addition, Mexico is the center of diversification of several groups. Our analysis focused on such groups. The aims were to identify areas of species richness and endemism. A data matrix with 766 species and 25 579 geographical records was analyzed. It included Calochortus (Liliaceae); Bletia (Orchidaceae); Tigridieae (Iridaceae); Amaryllidaceae; Poliantheae, Echeandia (Asparagaceae); Crassulaceae; Hylocereus (Cactaceae); Solanum, Lycianthes and Physalinae (Solanaceae); Salvia section Membranaceae (Lamiaceae); and Cosmos and Dahlia (Asteraceae). Using Geographic Information Systems, we determined richness and distribution based on: (i) Mexican political divisions, (ii) biogeographical regions and provinces, (iii) a grid of 0.5 × 0.5° cells, and (iv) elevation. The areas of endemism were estimated using the endemicity analysis. The highest number of taxa and endemic plants were concentrated within the Transmexican Volcanic Belt in the Mexican Transition Zone. This mountain range has been recognized as a province on the basis of geologic, tectonic, geomorphologic, physiographic and biogeographic criteria. It is a 1000 km long volcanic arc that extends east to west through Central Mexico and is variably from 80 to 230 km wide, between 17°30′ to 20°25′N and 96°20′ to 105°20′W. Our results represent a local deviation from the global richness latitudinal gradient of angiosperm species.

show abstract

“…Salvia subgenus Calosphace is a monophyletic clade with approximately 600 species (Fragoso‐Martínez et al., ; Walker, Sytsma, Treutlein, & Wink, ). Flowers present complex bilabiate or tubular floral architectures and contrasting pollination syndromes, with most species pollinated by bees, and about one‐third by hummingbirds (Wester & Claßen‐Bockhoff, ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In accordance, we predict a significant difference in the multivariate floral phenotype between pollination syndromes, as well as a higher phenotypic similarity on both mean trait values and variance‐covariance structure among melittophilous (bee‐pollinated) than among ornithophilous (bird‐pollinated) species across independent evolutionary transitions. In this study, means, variances and covariances of six corolla traits were analysed in bee‐ and hummingbird‐pollinated species of Neotropical sages ( Salvia subgenus Calosphace ), which represent independent evolutionary transitions between melittophily and ornithophily in a monophyletic clade (Fragoso‐Martínez et al., ). Data obtained from a sample of eighteen species were used to evaluate: (a) the magnitude of similarity of mean corolla traits and their variance‐covariance matrices between and within bee‐ and hummingbird‐pollinated species (following a morphospace approximation (Chartier et al., ) and common principal component (CPC) analyses (Phillips & Arnold, )), (b) the independent evolution of trait mean values and variance‐covariance matrices and (c) the expression of multivariate phylogenetic signal.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolutionary transition between bee pollination and hummingbird pollination inSalvia: Comparing means, variances and covariances of corolla traits

Benitez‐Vieyra

Pérez‐Alquicira

Sazatornil

et al. 2019

J of Evolutionary Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Covariation among traits can modify the evolutionary trajectory of complex structures. This process is thought to operate at a microevolutionary scale, but its long‐term effects remain controversial because trait covariation can itself evolve. Flower morphology, and particularly floral trait (co)variation, has been envisioned as the product of pollinator‐mediated selection. Available evidence suggests that major changes in pollinator assemblages may affect the joint expression of floral traits and their phenotypic integration. We expect species within a monophyletic lineage sharing the same pollinator type will show not only similarity in trait means but also similar phenotypic variance‐covariance structures. Here, we tested this expectation using eighteen Salvia species pollinated either by bees or by hummingbirds. Our findings indicated a nonsignificant multivariate phylogenetic signal and a decoupling between means and variance‐covariance phenotypic matrices of floral traits during the evolution to hummingbird pollination. Mean trait value analyses revealed significant differences between bee‐ and hummingbird‐pollinated Salvia species although fewer differences were detected in the covariance structure between groups. Variance‐covariance matrices were much more similar among bee‐ than hummingbird‐pollinated species. This pattern is consistent with the expectation that, unlike hummingbirds, bees physically manipulate the flower, presumably exerting stronger selection pressures favouring morphological convergence among species. Overall, we conclude that the evolution of hummingbird pollination proceeded through different independent transitions. Thus, although the evolution of hummingbird pollination led to a new phenotypic optimum, the process involved the diversification of the covariance structure.

show abstract

Phylogeny of the Neotropical sages (Salvia subg. Calosphace; Lamiaceae) and insights into pollinator and area shifts

Cited by 66 publications

References 62 publications

Lamiaceae de México

Lamiaceae de México

Richness, geographic distribution patterns, and areas of endemism of selected angiosperm groups in Mexico

Evolutionary transition between bee pollination and hummingbird pollination inSalvia: Comparing means, variances and covariances of corolla traits

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About