Amber, fossilized plant resin from gymnosperms and angiosperms, is renowned for preserving a wide range of organisms in microscopic fidelity. These so-called amber inclusions comprise many groups of organisms, ranging frombacteria to arthropods and vertebrates (Penney, 2010; Ragazzi and Schmidt, 2011;Grimaldi and Ross, 2017). Organisms trapped in amber typically derive from forest ecosystems where they became stuck to resin outpourings in their habitats (Seyfullah and Schmidt, 2015). In addition, ambers are prime examples of chemical fossils that are relatively resistant to diagenesis and can retain their original chemical and isotopic compositions. Therefore, chemical profiles of ambers may support the detection of the resin-bearing plants and the reconstruction of the paleoenvironment and paleoclimate (Langenheim, 2003; Dal Corso et al., 2017). The study of amber and its inclusions should consequently enable the reconstruction of past forest ecosystems and even prevailing climatic conditions. However, several constraints exist for this approach. Much amber from the hundreds of worldwide localities does not contain notable inclusions or predominantly preserved arthropods, prokaryotes, and fungal mycelia (Martınez-Delclòs et al., 2004; Labandeira, 2014). Arthropods are indeed the most commonly studied amber inclusions, whereas fossil plant remains and palynomorphs, on which reconstructions of Cenozoic forests and derived climate estimates are typically based on (Ferguson et al., 1998; Bruch and Mosbrugger, 2002; Kunzmann and Walther, 2012), are relatively rare in amber. Only six worldwide amber deposits harbor plenty of plant inclusions, so far: Miocene Dominican and Mexican ambers, Paleogene Baltic, Bitterfeld, and Rovno ambers, and mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber (Penney, 2010). Further hurdles are linked to the physical properties of amber. Once reworked from the original sediment, amber may float or drift in sea water, and the notion exists that even amber specimens forming large deposits may have been reworked and transported, originally belonging to older and possibly geographically distinct sediments (Weitschat and Wichard, 2010). Baltic and Bitterfeld ambers constitute the largest Paleogene amber deposits worldwide, with estimated 640,000 tons of fossil resin for the Baltic deposit (Weitschat and Wichard, 2010) and approximately 3000 tons for the central German Bitterfeld locality (Liehmann, 2013). Hundreds of thousands of inclusions were found in Baltic amber, with >3000 species described from Baltic amber (Weitschat and Wichard, 2010) and >700 species reported from Bitterfeld amber (Rappsilber, 2016). Uncertainties regarding botanical provenance, age, and geographical origin are particularly associated with these two amber deposits. Langenheim (2003) introduced the term "Tertiary Baltic Amber Mystery" to refer to the conflicting evidence about the botanical source of succinite, which is the main resin variety of Baltic