The spawning site of the fluvial eight-barbel loach, Lefua sp. (sensu Hosoya, 1993; Japanese name: nagare-hotoke-dojo), an endangered species, was investigated by searching for fertilized eggs in June and July 1995-1997 in an upper reach of the Kako River, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan. We obtained one egg each by a random sampling with agitating the river bottom (80 trials) and by collecting drift samples (89 trials). This finding indicates that the eggs were not scattered on the bottom or into the water column after being spawned. Two individual males were observed to patrol around particular interstices occurring under the buried cobbles and under the boulders that formed the riverbank. Males pecked other individuals that approached around the interstices. We obtained 9 and 15 eggs, respectively, from two such interstices in only two collection trials. The interstices were suggested to function as the spawning sites of this endangered fish in nature.
Materials and MethodsInvestigation site.-We set up an investigation section (about 45 m long and 0.5-2 m wide) at an upper reach of a headwater tributary of the Kako River (about 310 m altitude and 6.7% gradient), which flows into the Seto Inland Sea on the south coast of Honshu, Japan. The bottom of the section comprised sand, pebbles, cobbles, and boulders with water depth to 30 cm. The area adjacent to the section was mainly covered with a thick growth of coniferous trees, and aquatic plants were not seen within the section. As for coexisting fish, Rhinogobius flumineus was seen very rarely within 5 m from the downstream end of this section. Except for fishes, we also found the Tago's brown frog Rana (Rana) tagoi tagoi, a freshwater crab Geothelphusa dehaani, a fishing spider Dolomedes raptor, and larvae of aquatic insects, i.e., a flying dragon Anotogaster sieboldii, a dobsonfly Protohermes grandis, and plecopterans in the reach.To conduct individual identification and determine sex for Lefua sp. individuals occurring within the investigation section, we randomly captured individuals monthly, and took photographs of their abdomens according to the methods of Aoyama (2000). For individual identification, we used the natural variation in the pattern of abdominal white lines (Aoyama, 2000). We released each individual at the capture point after they had recovered from anesthetization required for photographing. To assess the condition of the gonad development of females, we compared the size and numbers of ovarian eggs observed through the abdominal skin from the photographs within 2 consecutive months.
IchthyologicalResearch