2014
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323926111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants

Abstract: Reconstructing the origin and evolution of land plants and their algal relatives is a fundamental problem in plant phylogenetics, and is essential for understanding how critical adaptations arose, including the embryo, vascular tissue, seeds, and flowers. Despite advances in molecular systematics, some hypotheses of relationships remain weakly resolved. Inferring deep phylogenies with bouts of rapid diversification can be problematic; however, genome-scale data should significantly increase the number of infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

78
1,173
4
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,159 publications
(1,296 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
78
1,173
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A phylogenomic approach targeting thousands of independently evolved nuclear loci may be the only way to assess the current taxonomy of this group, and dissect the roles of hybridization and introgression in the origin and rapid diversification of this insular lineage. Phylogenomic methods based on markers identified from, e.g., restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) (Cruaud et al, 2014;Eaton and Ree, 2013;Smith et al, 2014), targeted enrichment of ultraconserved elements (UCEs) or conserved ortholog sequences (COS) (Mandel et al, 2014;Smith et al, 2014), and RNA-Seq (Wen et al, 2013;Wickett et al, 2014) could be suitable methods to resolve Hawaiian mint relationships. However, these approaches are also associated with challenges, including accurately inferring orthology in high polyploid plants, slow mutation rates in exonic regions, which may be too low to resolve recent radiations (Giarla and Esselstyn, 2015), and the need to obtaining high quality RNA and DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A phylogenomic approach targeting thousands of independently evolved nuclear loci may be the only way to assess the current taxonomy of this group, and dissect the roles of hybridization and introgression in the origin and rapid diversification of this insular lineage. Phylogenomic methods based on markers identified from, e.g., restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) (Cruaud et al, 2014;Eaton and Ree, 2013;Smith et al, 2014), targeted enrichment of ultraconserved elements (UCEs) or conserved ortholog sequences (COS) (Mandel et al, 2014;Smith et al, 2014), and RNA-Seq (Wen et al, 2013;Wickett et al, 2014) could be suitable methods to resolve Hawaiian mint relationships. However, these approaches are also associated with challenges, including accurately inferring orthology in high polyploid plants, slow mutation rates in exonic regions, which may be too low to resolve recent radiations (Giarla and Esselstyn, 2015), and the need to obtaining high quality RNA and DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported placement of P. persica (Rosales) is discrepant between plastid-54 and nuclear-based analyses 52,53 .…”
Section: Maximum-likelihood Inference Of Orthogroup Gains and Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated the divergence times of the surveyed species using RAxML version 8 51 , employing tree topologies published previously [52][53][54] . The reported placement of P. persica (Rosales) is discrepant between plastid-54 and nuclear-based analyses 52,53 .…”
Section: Maximum-likelihood Inference Of Orthogroup Gains and Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We review what is known about the recurrent evolution of plant defense signaling networks across streptophyte evolution (Figure 1). In so doing, we span the trajectory from streptophyte algae (the closest extant relatives to land plants [3-5]), mosses, gymnosperms, and angiosperms. Since most data have been gathered for angiosperms, we will use them primarily for comparative purposes.
10.1080/19420889.2018.1486168-F0001Figure 1.Key phytopathogen interaction factors across the trajectory of streptophyte evolution.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%