2016
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PHYLOViZ 2.0: providing scalable data integration and visualization for multiple phylogenetic inference methods

Abstract: cvaz@inesc-id.ptSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
244
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
244
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…NG-MAST, MLST, and NG-STAR sequence typing was performed by using gene sequences extracted in silico from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data and submitted to the NG-MAST (http://www.ng-mast.net/), Neisseria MLST (http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/), and NG-STAR (https://ngstar.canada.ca) websites to determine the respective STs. The relatedness of allelic profiles was visualized by using PHYLOViZ 2.0 (41,42) to produce a full goeBURST minimum spanning tree. MLST and NG-STAR CCs were defined by a single-locus variation in allelic profiles from a founding ST, while an NG-MAST CC was determined by 5 or more single-nucleotide polymorphisms of concatenated and aligned porB and tbpB sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NG-MAST, MLST, and NG-STAR sequence typing was performed by using gene sequences extracted in silico from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data and submitted to the NG-MAST (http://www.ng-mast.net/), Neisseria MLST (http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/), and NG-STAR (https://ngstar.canada.ca) websites to determine the respective STs. The relatedness of allelic profiles was visualized by using PHYLOViZ 2.0 (41,42) to produce a full goeBURST minimum spanning tree. MLST and NG-STAR CCs were defined by a single-locus variation in allelic profiles from a founding ST, while an NG-MAST CC was determined by 5 or more single-nucleotide polymorphisms of concatenated and aligned porB and tbpB sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLVA-11 was also used to determine phylogeographic relationships between our isolates and 528 isolates from MLVAbank including not available group (2), Africa group (4), America group (75), West Mediterranean group (77), China group (97), and East Mediterranean group (273). Minimum-spaning trees were constructed using the goeBURST algorithm with PHYOVIZ 2.0 (Francisco et al, 2012; Nascimento et al, 2017). MLVA-16 cluster analysis was extended to 194 B. melitensis strains including the Ulanqab isolates reported here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylograms may, however, be problematic for the presentation of large numbers of genotypes because Dendroscope (Huson and Scornavacca 2012)) from large datasets were also difficult to interpret. Still other graphical user interfaces were unable to even depict this large number of items, including PHYLOViZ 2.0 (Nascimento et al 2017), SplitsTree4 (Huson and Bryant 2006), EvolView (He et al 2016), Microreact (Argimon et al 2016), TreeDyn (Chevenet et al 2006),TreeView (Page 1996 and Phandango (Hadfield et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to phylograms are minimum spanning trees, which have less demanding graphical requirements because they map clusters of related nodes in 2-D space (Francisco et al 2012;Nascimento et al 2017). A commercial software program (Bionumerics, Applied Maths, Belgium) introduced an improved visualization of a minimum spanning tree to microbiologists in the early 1990s, which reduced complexity by grouping isolates with identical STs within single nodes whose diameter reflected the numbers of isolates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%