2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/549894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and Combustion Characteristics of Briquettes Made from Water Hyacinth and Phytoplankton Scum as Binder

Abstract: The study investigated the potential of water hyacinths and phytoplankton scum, an aquatic weed, as binder for production of fuel briquettes. It also evaluated some physical and combustion characteristics. The water hyacinths were manually harvested, cleaned, sun-dried, and milled to particle sizes distribution ranging from <0.25 to 4.75 mm using hammer mill. The water hyacinth grinds and binder (phytoplankton scum) at 10% (B 1 ), 20% (B 2 ), 30% (B 3 ), 40% (B 4 ), and 50% (B 5 ) by weight of each feedstock w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bamboo briquette did not burn completely. The results of our ignition test are similar to those found by other authors [ 32 ], who report ranges from 83 to 138 seconds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Bamboo briquette did not burn completely. The results of our ignition test are similar to those found by other authors [ 32 ], who report ranges from 83 to 138 seconds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The water resistance test was carried out in accordance with the procedure described in Davies and Davies, [54]. A digital weighing balance (Model AND GF 3000) was used to measure the initial weight of each sample briquette and then dunked in water for 2 min.…”
Section: Water Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy parameters such as Calorific value, bulk density and energy density of Tender Coconut Husks, Corn Cobs, and Palm Kernel Shells biomasses charcoals used in this study were investigated in early works [4] [5]. In this paper, the were in contradiction to those obtained by R. M. Davies et al [17] and A.O Akintaro et al [10]. The discrepancy between our results and those of the authors mentioned above could be due to the fact that they used much higher binder concentration, ranging from 10% to 50% by mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%