1998
DOI: 10.1080/09595239800186991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and mental health problems in amphetamine users from metropolitan Adelaide, Australia

Abstract: Phase I of this study was designed to inform the development of a range of responses to hazardous and harmful amphetamine use. Research techniques from Rapid Assessment Methodology (RAM) were utilized to collect data. A survey of current amphetamine users included the Short Form 36 (SF36) Health Status Questionnaire, for which South Australian population norms were published in 1995. This facilitated comparisons of the health of this sample of amphetamine users with that of the general population. The sample w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baker, et al, 1991; Bindman, et al, 1991; Grumbach, et al, 1993; McCaig & Burt, 2003; Pane, et al, 1991). Further, these findings are consistent with the literature from non-ED settings showing that drug users often have co-occurring mental health problems (Barry, et al, 2006; Grant, 1995; Johnson, Brems, & Burke, 2002; Kandel, Huang, & Davies, 2001; Vincent, Schoobridge, Ask, Allsop, & Ali, 1998) and poor physical health (Adrian & Barry, 2003; Chen, Scheier, & Kandel, 1996; Garrity, et al, 2007; Marzuk, et al, 1995; Vincent, et al, 1998). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Baker, et al, 1991; Bindman, et al, 1991; Grumbach, et al, 1993; McCaig & Burt, 2003; Pane, et al, 1991). Further, these findings are consistent with the literature from non-ED settings showing that drug users often have co-occurring mental health problems (Barry, et al, 2006; Grant, 1995; Johnson, Brems, & Burke, 2002; Kandel, Huang, & Davies, 2001; Vincent, Schoobridge, Ask, Allsop, & Ali, 1998) and poor physical health (Adrian & Barry, 2003; Chen, Scheier, & Kandel, 1996; Garrity, et al, 2007; Marzuk, et al, 1995; Vincent, et al, 1998). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The majority of existing research has focused on populations of methamphetamine users living in major metropolitan areas [1,7,8,16,17] and only a few studies have investigated the patterns and correlates of methamphetamine use outside of urban areas in Australia [14,[18][19][20][21] or elsewhere [22][23][24]. Understanding the nature of the problem is critical to adequately plan health services, allocate resources, provide suitable interventions and improve treatment coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although psychostimulants have been noted for their adverse impact on various mental health domains among regular users (Darke et al, 2008;Vincent et al, 1998), and although Hawke et al (2000) found more severe psychopathology among young psychostimulant than among nonpsychostimulant users in residential treatment, in this study the primarily cannabis-and psychostimulantdependent young people demonstrated similar mental health profiles. This is not surprising in relation to psychoticism, which has been consistently and causally 3 linked to cannabis use (Cohen, Solowij, & Carr, 2008;Hall, 2006;McLaren, Lemon, Robins, & Mattick, 2008;Moore et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This finding may be expected given that the effects of cannabis on these health areas have not been clearly established (McLaren & Mattick, 2007), whereas the adverse effects of psychostimulants and opioids on physical health have been demonstrated (Darke, Kaye, McKetin, & Duflou, 2008;Vincent, Shoobridge, Ask, Allspo, & Ali, 1998;Williamson, Darke, Ross, & Teesson, 2009). Although cannabis-dependent individuals had less impairment in physical health than opioid-or psychostimulantdependent individuals, their physical health was nevertheless impaired.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%