2021
DOI: 10.1111/jtxs.12585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and structural characteristics of starch‐based and conventional cookies: Water sorption, mechanical glass transition, and texture properties of their crust and crumb

Abstract: The physical properties of starch‐based cookie (gluten free and low fat) were compared with those of conventional cookie in consideration for the difference between crust and crumb parts. The internal porosity of the samples was measured by X‐ray computed tomography. The starch‐based cookie had a higher porosity (0.61) than the conventional cookie (0.42). The mechanical glass‐transition temperature (Tg) of the samples was evaluated by the thermal rheological analysis. The anhydrous mechanical Tg of the starch‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It involves assessing various textural attributes such as hardness, chewiness, crispness, and brittleness. These measurements provide insights into the sensory experience and quality of the cookies [70]. For the analysis of the cookie samples, we have taken two major texture parameters: hardness and fracturability (Figure 16).…”
Section: Texture Analysis Of Cookiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves assessing various textural attributes such as hardness, chewiness, crispness, and brittleness. These measurements provide insights into the sensory experience and quality of the cookies [70]. For the analysis of the cookie samples, we have taken two major texture parameters: hardness and fracturability (Figure 16).…”
Section: Texture Analysis Of Cookiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity was defined as the ratio of bulk density to material density. The porosity ( ε ) of the raspberry chips was calculated using Equation (7) (Sogabe, Kobayashi, Thanatuksorn, Suzuki, & Kawai, 2021) ε()%goodbreak=()1goodbreak−ρbρm100 where ρ b is the bulk density of raspberry chips (g/cm 3 ), ρ m is the material density of raspberry chips (g/cm 3 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity was defined as the ratio of bulk density to material density. The porosity (ε) of the raspberry chips was calculated using Equation ( 7) (Sogabe, Kobayashi, Thanatuksorn, Suzuki, & Kawai, 2021)…”
Section: Porositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were set up horizontally on a platform, using a cylindrical probe with a flat end which was ½ inch in diameter. Concerning the conditions of the instrumental texture tests, the pre-test speed was 2 mm s −1 and the post-test was 10 mm s −1 , with a distance of 4.0 mm and a compression force measurement [24]. Measurements started 24 h after slaughter and were repeated up to 360 h after pre-slaughter.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%