2011
DOI: 10.4314/ijhr.v3i2.70269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Approaches to Penetration Enhancement

Abstract: an online international journal allowing free unlimited access to abstract and full-text of published articles. The journal is devoted to the promotion of health sciences and related disciplines (including medicine, pharmacy, nursing, biotechnology, cell and molecular biology, and related engineering fields). It seeks particularly (but not exclusively) to encourage multidisciplinary research and collaboration among scientists, the industry and the healthcare professionals. It will also provide an international… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective and reliable delivery of drugs, however, presents an entirely new set of challenges, which are stringently controlled, albeit less so than oral/parental dosage forms, by regulatory bodies such as the US Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA). To meet the criteria for reliable and reproducible skin-mediated drug delivery, a range of approaches and enhancement techniques, primarily aimed at disrupting the formidable barrier effect of the (epi)dermal layer, have been proposed, and these are typically physical or chemical in origin (Howard & Kenneth, 1996;Benson, 2005;Ritesh & Anil, 2007;Tiwary et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2007;Nikhil et al, 2008;Dhamecha et al, 2009;Pathan & Setty, 2009;Kumar et al, 2010;Madishetti et al, 2010;Sharma et al, 2011). The physical techniques primarily include iontophoresis, sonophoresis and laser-based treatments, all of which are laborious, require specialized equipment and there are also cases of irreversible skin damage being attributed to such approaches (Meidan et al, 1999;Fang et al, 2004;Brahma & Shyam, 2008;Clara et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective and reliable delivery of drugs, however, presents an entirely new set of challenges, which are stringently controlled, albeit less so than oral/parental dosage forms, by regulatory bodies such as the US Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA). To meet the criteria for reliable and reproducible skin-mediated drug delivery, a range of approaches and enhancement techniques, primarily aimed at disrupting the formidable barrier effect of the (epi)dermal layer, have been proposed, and these are typically physical or chemical in origin (Howard & Kenneth, 1996;Benson, 2005;Ritesh & Anil, 2007;Tiwary et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2007;Nikhil et al, 2008;Dhamecha et al, 2009;Pathan & Setty, 2009;Kumar et al, 2010;Madishetti et al, 2010;Sharma et al, 2011). The physical techniques primarily include iontophoresis, sonophoresis and laser-based treatments, all of which are laborious, require specialized equipment and there are also cases of irreversible skin damage being attributed to such approaches (Meidan et al, 1999;Fang et al, 2004;Brahma & Shyam, 2008;Clara et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10] Evaluation of Drug Loaded Patches of HPMC E-15 and Eudragit RS-100:-Physicochemical Evaluation:-Physical Appearance:-Formulated patches were evaluated for their physical appearance, uniformity, entrapment of any air bubble or precipitation of drug, which on a large part determines patient acceptability of the patch and also therapeutic efficacy. [11] Thickness:-Thickness of Transdermal patch was measured by using Mitutoyo Digimatic Micrometer. Thickness of rectangular patch (2x2cms) was determined at three different points and average thickness was calculated.…”
Section: Materials and Method:-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are an important factor in a TDDS which is used to improve the flux (J). Flux can be defined as the amount of material flowing through the unit cross section area at the time (t) [10].…”
Section: Permeation Enhancersmentioning
confidence: 99%