Physical capacity, not skeletal maturity, distinguishes competitive levels in male Norwegian U14 soccer players

Abstract

Funding information IdrettsCampus BergenThe main aim of the present study was to compare skeletal maturity level and physical capacities between male Norwegian soccer players playing at elite, sub-elite and non-elite level. Secondary, we aimed to investigate the association between skeletal maturity level and physical capacities. One hundred and two U14 soccer players (12.8-14.5 years old) recruited from four local clubs, and a regional team were tested for bone age and physical capacities. Bone age was estimated with x-ray of their left hand and used to indicate maturation of the skeleton. Players went through a comprehensive test battery to assess their physical capacities. Between-groups analysis revealed no difference in chronological age, skeletal maturity level, leg strength, body weight, or stature. However, elite players were superior to sub-elite and nonelite players on important functional characteristics as intermittent-endurance capacity (running distance: 1664 m ± 367 vs 1197 m ± 338 vs 693 m ± 235) and running speed (fastest 10 m split time: 1.27 seconds ± 0.06 vs 1.33 seconds ± 0.10 vs 1.39 seconds ± 0.11), in addition to maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max ), standing long jump, and upper body strength (P < .05 for all comparisons). Medium-to-large correlations were found between skeletal maturity level and peak force (r = 695, P < .01), power (r = 684, P < .01), sprint (r = −.471, P<.001), and jump performance (r = .359, P < .01), but no correlation with upper body strength, V O 2max , or intermittent-endurance capacity. These findings imply that skeletal maturity level does not bias the selection of players, although well-developed physical capacity clearly distinguishes competitive levels. The superior physical performance of the highest-ranked players seems related to an appropriate training environment. K E Y W O R D Scompetitive levels, physical capacity, skeletal maturation, talent selection, youth soccer | 255 GRENDSTAD ET Al.

Sprint Interval Running and Continuous Running Produce Training Specific Adaptations, Despite a Similar Improvement of Aerobic Endurance Capacity—A Randomized Trial of Healthy Adults

“…The incremental test to exhaustion followed current recommendations for test duration [23], and was performed according to the standard protocol of the Norwegian Olympic Sports Centre (see e.g., [24]). Prior to the pre-test, subjects performed two familiarization tests to reduce the learning effect, following the recommendations of Edgett et al [25].…”

Physical characteristics of elite youth male football players aged 13–15 are based upon biological maturity

“…Research on the physical performance characteristics of youth football players has made significant progress in recent years. Studies have revealed that elite youth football players are superior in anthropometrics (height, body mass, and body composition) ( Bidaurrazaga-Letona et al, 2016 ; Deprez et al, 2015a ; Nughes et al, 2020 ; Bongiovanni et al, 2020 ) and physical characteristics (speed, agility, anaerobic endurance, strength, and power) ( Emmonds et al, 2016 ; Aquino et al, 2017 ; Grendstad et al, 2020 ; Deprez et al, 2015b ), which are important factors influencing selection by coaches ( Patel et al, 2020 ; Bidaurrazaga-Letona et al, 2019 ; Nughes et al, 2020 ). As such, football players’ physical characteristics significantly influence the selection of elite vs non-elite players while they are still youths ( Itoh & Hirose, 2020 ).…”

Motion Analysis of Match Play in U14 Male Soccer Players and the Influence of Position, Competitive Level and Contextual Variables

“…The current study is part of a longitudinal research project, examining factors related to talent development in youth soccer [ 12 ]. The study design in the present study is descriptive, and match running performance data were collected during the 2018 season, from April to October.…”