2016
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2016034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical characterisation of soils recovered from the ANZAC battlefield

Abstract: As part of a unique tri‐nation study to commemorate the centenary of the iconic First World War ANZAC battlefield, this paper summarises the results of a laboratory experimental investigation of some geotechnical and geophysical characteristics of soil recovered from this field in Gallipoli, Turkey. The geophysical characterisation of these samples comprises the determination of the dielectric properties, namely real, imaginary and dielectric dispersion, over a frequency band between 200 MHz and 6 GHz. This ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This likely explains why a single calibration has been adopted for a range of soil types in previous studies (e.g., see [53,54,84,85]). The empirical Topp calibration proposed by Topp, Davis and Annan [53] was based on soils ranging from heavy clay to sandy loam; however, it is unable to accurately estimate the water content of some soil samples tested in the current study and also in a number of previous studies (e.g., [86,87,88,89,90]). Nonetheless, it is currently one of the most widely used empirical calibrations for estimating water content using soil dielectric properties.…”
Section: Results Analyses and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This likely explains why a single calibration has been adopted for a range of soil types in previous studies (e.g., see [53,54,84,85]). The empirical Topp calibration proposed by Topp, Davis and Annan [53] was based on soils ranging from heavy clay to sandy loam; however, it is unable to accurately estimate the water content of some soil samples tested in the current study and also in a number of previous studies (e.g., [86,87,88,89,90]). Nonetheless, it is currently one of the most widely used empirical calibrations for estimating water content using soil dielectric properties.…”
Section: Results Analyses and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This likely explains why a single calibration has been adopted for a range of soil types in previous studies (e.g., see [53,54,84,85]). The empirical Topp calibration proposed by Topp, Davis and Annan [53] was based on soils ranging from heavy clay to sandy loam; however, it is unable to accurately estimate the water content of some soil samples tested in the current study and also in a number of previous studies (e.g., [86][87][88][89][90]). Nonetheless, it is currently one of the most widely used empirical calibrations for estimating water content using soil dielectric properties.…”
Section: Effect Of Soil Type On the Calibration Of The Sensormentioning
confidence: 75%
“…A dielectric slim form probe was used to measure the dielectric properties of the soil samples in situ. The dielectric properties values were measured with three replications, as suggested in [29], and the mean values were used for data analysis. The setup for measuring dielectric properties is depicted in Figure 3.…”
Section: Measurement Of Dielectric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%