Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Plant flammability is strongly influenced by functional traits, meaning that the quantitative measurement of trait–flammability relationships is key to understanding why some species burn better than others. While relationships between flammability and leaf traits are well‐studied, the role of architectural traits has rarely been assessed. Shoots preserve some of the architecture of plants; therefore, shoot‐level trait–flammability relationships offer great promise for determining the relative influence of fuel architecture and leaf traits on flammability. We quantified plant flammability by burning 70‐cm‐long shoot samples from 65 species of indigenous and exotic New Zealand trees and shrubs and measured a range of leaf and fuel architectural traits on the same individuals. The influence of species' evolutionary history on flammability variation was also quantified. Most of the variation in flammability and functional traits was explained by between‐species differences. No significant phylogenetic signal was detected for the flammability variables measured in this study. Fuel architecture influenced shoot flammability, and along with leaf traits, explained a high proportion (41%–54%) of flammability variation. Branching patterns (number of ramifications and sub‐branches) was the key architectural trait that was strongly positively correlated with flammability. Other architectural traits, such as foliage and twig fraction mass, and fuel bulk density were also significantly associated with some flammability variables. Leaf dry matter content (LDMC; positive relationship) and leaf thickness (negative relationship) were the leaf traits most strongly correlated with shoot flammability. Synthesis. Our study addresses a key knowledge gap by demonstrating the influence of fuel architecture on shoot flammability and improves our understanding of why species with certain architecture (e.g. highly branched) burn better than others. However, leaf traits such as leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and leaf thickness emerged as having a relatively stronger influence on flammability than architectural traits. Where available, traits such as LDMC, leaf thickness and branching pattern can be effective surrogates of plant flammability and can be used to improve global dynamic vegetation models and fire behaviour models. However, several architectural traits are time‐consuming to measure, so where they are not available, it will be quicker to simply measure shoot flammability.
Plant flammability is strongly influenced by functional traits, meaning that the quantitative measurement of trait–flammability relationships is key to understanding why some species burn better than others. While relationships between flammability and leaf traits are well‐studied, the role of architectural traits has rarely been assessed. Shoots preserve some of the architecture of plants; therefore, shoot‐level trait–flammability relationships offer great promise for determining the relative influence of fuel architecture and leaf traits on flammability. We quantified plant flammability by burning 70‐cm‐long shoot samples from 65 species of indigenous and exotic New Zealand trees and shrubs and measured a range of leaf and fuel architectural traits on the same individuals. The influence of species' evolutionary history on flammability variation was also quantified. Most of the variation in flammability and functional traits was explained by between‐species differences. No significant phylogenetic signal was detected for the flammability variables measured in this study. Fuel architecture influenced shoot flammability, and along with leaf traits, explained a high proportion (41%–54%) of flammability variation. Branching patterns (number of ramifications and sub‐branches) was the key architectural trait that was strongly positively correlated with flammability. Other architectural traits, such as foliage and twig fraction mass, and fuel bulk density were also significantly associated with some flammability variables. Leaf dry matter content (LDMC; positive relationship) and leaf thickness (negative relationship) were the leaf traits most strongly correlated with shoot flammability. Synthesis. Our study addresses a key knowledge gap by demonstrating the influence of fuel architecture on shoot flammability and improves our understanding of why species with certain architecture (e.g. highly branched) burn better than others. However, leaf traits such as leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and leaf thickness emerged as having a relatively stronger influence on flammability than architectural traits. Where available, traits such as LDMC, leaf thickness and branching pattern can be effective surrogates of plant flammability and can be used to improve global dynamic vegetation models and fire behaviour models. However, several architectural traits are time‐consuming to measure, so where they are not available, it will be quicker to simply measure shoot flammability.
No abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the pyrolysis of selected California foliage and estimate the energy content of the released volatiles to show the significance of the pyrolysis of foliage and its role during wildland fires. While the majority of the volatiles released during the pyrolysis of foliage later combust and promote fire propagation, studies on the energy released from combustion of these compounds are scarce. Samples of chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), Eastwood’s manzanita (Arctostaphylos glandulosa), scrub oak (Quercus berberidifolia), hoaryleaf ceanothus (Ceanothus crassifolius), all native to southern California, and sparkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum), native to the southern U.S., were pyrolyzed at 725 °C with a heating rate of approximately 180 °C/s to mimic the conditions of wildland fires. Tar and light gases were collected and analyzed. Tar from chamise, scrub oak, ceanothus and sparkleberry was abundant in aromatics, especially phenol, while tar from manzanita was mainly composed of cycloalkenes. The four major components of light gases were CO, CO2, CH4 and H2. Estimated values for the high heating values (HHVs) of volatiles ranged between 18.9 and 23.2 (MJ/kg of biomass) with tar contributing to over 80% of the HHVs of the volatiles. Therefore, fire studies should consider the heat released from volatiles present in both tar and light gases during pyrolysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.