2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp02228j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical chemistry in a single live cell: confocal microscopy

Abstract: A live cell is a complex, yet extremely important container. Understanding the dynamics in a selected intracellular component is a challenging task. We have recently made significant progress in this direction using a confocal microscope as a tool. The smallest size of the focused spot in a confocal microscope is ∼0.2 μm (200 nm). This is nearly one hundred times smaller than the size of a live cell. Thus, one can selectively study different intracellular components/organelles in a live cell. In this paper, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results therefore indicate that the macroscopic viscosity in the nucleus is lower than that in the cytoplasm and the dielectric constant of the environment is higher in the nucleus than that in the cytoplasm. These findings seem to be difficult to be obtained by other methods such as fluorescence and optical tomography, and we believe that the present result will become the basis of the evaluation of dynamics and molecular structures of biomolecules in cellular compartments in terms of macromolecular crowding. The present result is consistent with the recent measurement of the refractive index or fluorescence dynamics of a dye in a cell. The refractive index was shown to be smaller in the nucleus than that in the cytoplasm, suggesting a low concentration of organic molecules in the nucleus. , On the basis of the position of the emission maximum of an exogenous dye, the dielectric constant of the nucleus was suggested to be larger than that of the cytoplasm. The viscosities of the nucleus and cytoplasm were also estimated to be ∼13 and ∼14.5 cP, respectively . It is noted that the present value is the average of the intracellular environment, which slightly fluctuates in seconds .…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The present results therefore indicate that the macroscopic viscosity in the nucleus is lower than that in the cytoplasm and the dielectric constant of the environment is higher in the nucleus than that in the cytoplasm. These findings seem to be difficult to be obtained by other methods such as fluorescence and optical tomography, and we believe that the present result will become the basis of the evaluation of dynamics and molecular structures of biomolecules in cellular compartments in terms of macromolecular crowding. The present result is consistent with the recent measurement of the refractive index or fluorescence dynamics of a dye in a cell. The refractive index was shown to be smaller in the nucleus than that in the cytoplasm, suggesting a low concentration of organic molecules in the nucleus. , On the basis of the position of the emission maximum of an exogenous dye, the dielectric constant of the nucleus was suggested to be larger than that of the cytoplasm. The viscosities of the nucleus and cytoplasm were also estimated to be ∼13 and ∼14.5 cP, respectively . It is noted that the present value is the average of the intracellular environment, which slightly fluctuates in seconds .…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…In bulk water, solvation displays a time scale of ∼1 ps. However, in many constrained environment (proteins, DNA, and biological cell), water exhibits a component of ca. 100–1000 ps. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 These experiments are intermediate in complexity between studying an isolated protein in a solution 6,7 and that in a single live cell studied by super-resolution microscopy and time-resolved confocal microscopy. 25,26 In general, it is believed that crowding and the associated excluded volume effect accelerate protein folding and aggregation, enhance stability, and modulate enzyme activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…32 Using absorption spectra to gauge the interface polarity often leads to dielectric constants lower than the bulk. For instance, ϵ ≃ 15 was reported for the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells, whereas ϵ ≃ 65 was found for the cell nucleus 33 (ϵ ≃ 78 in the bulk). The lower effective dielectric constants are attributed to the prevalence of interfacial water in the crowded cellular medium.…”
Section: ■ Interface Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%