2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical-digital model for co-design in healthcare buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Users also influence decisions on design options. This level of involvement represents the highest in the building design process, according to various authors (e.g., [14,49]). In fact, there are two other levels of user involvement, as explained by Caixeta et al [14]: the informative level and consultative level.…”
Section: Lean Approach In Healthcare Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Users also influence decisions on design options. This level of involvement represents the highest in the building design process, according to various authors (e.g., [14,49]). In fact, there are two other levels of user involvement, as explained by Caixeta et al [14]: the informative level and consultative level.…”
Section: Lean Approach In Healthcare Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there are two other levels of user involvement, as explained by Caixeta et al [14]: the informative level and consultative level. Each classification of levels is based on the reason and typology of interaction between users and architects [49]. The informative level is when users are not proactive.…”
Section: Lean Approach In Healthcare Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each type of client stakeholder has their own needs and interests that could sometimes be conflicting with those of others [11,12]. In the end, what usually happens is that only the "paying client" will be involved in the project definition process and "user" clients will usually be neglected [13,14]. The lack of involvement disrupts the potential for viewing and understanding all design angles (e.g., functional) and potentially leads to errors in the design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the traditional mindset, users in this approach play a significant role from the beginning of project definition since they are involved in the process of mapping, analyzing, and optimizing the care pathways (flows) that patients and clinicians would follow [17]. In this mindset, involving users in the process is seen as an essential step for a successful project [3] as it will help design professionals to communicate better with users to align their needs with the ultimate design solutions [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of research to account for the contributions of nurses (Clark, 2014), patients (Castro et al, 2018), and even surrounding communities (Farmer & Nimegeer, 2014) as part of a collection of interdisciplinary committees. Fueled by participatory design frameworks, the interdisciplinary interactions of these "nondesigner" participants within healthcare design teams are facilitated by paper-based representations (Payne et al, 2015), full scale prototypes (Kasali & Nersessian, 2015), or other novel digital methods (Caixeta & Fabricio, 2021). As documented in the studies above, the participatory design models strategically bring designers and nondesigners together to enable the adaptation, appropriation, or invention of functions concerning a particular layout configuration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%